DOJ-OGR-00019122.jpg

544 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 544 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), and the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding a briefing schedule that needs to be resolved before the government rests its case. The Judge denies a request for simultaneous briefing and sets a deadline of 7:00 PM for the government and 10:00 PM for the defense.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Rohrbach Prosecutor (Government)
Representing the government; requesting resolution on a legal matter before the close of the government's case.
The Court Judge
Presiding judge (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer based on case number); setting briefing schedules and deadlines.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Representing the defense; agreeing to the briefing schedule set by the court.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Government
Referred to by Mr. Rohrbach and The Court.
DOJ
Indicated by the 'DOJ-OGR' stamp in the footer.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding scheduling of legal briefs during trial.
Southern District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the reporter's name and case context.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Rohrbach Opposing Counsel Mr. Pagliuca
Rohrbach speaks for the government; Pagliuca speaks for the defense.

Key Quotes (3)

"I guess the question is so you presumably need resolution before the close of the government's case."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019122.jpg
Quote #1
"So I'll say 7 for the government, 10 for the defense."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019122.jpg
Quote #2
"Since we don't know, the government would prefer to brief it tonight."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00019122.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,492 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 260 of 262 1971
LC8VMAX8
1 THE COURT: I guess the question is so you presumably
2 need resolution before the close of the government's case.
3 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
4 THE COURT: That could be -- it could be tomorrow, but
5 I suppose -- well, if you want resolution tomorrow, following
6 briefing by both sides, then you'll be mindful of the Court's
7 schedule.
8 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: And I would need briefing completed, I
10 think, by 10 p.m. tonight.
11 Now, if I have till Friday to resolve it, if I have
12 till Friday to resolve it, then you can have till midnight, I
13 suppose. But I gather we don't know whether we'll have the
14 jury here on Friday or not.
15 MR. ROHRBACH: Since we don't know, the government
16 would prefer to brief it tonight. We could propose doing
17 simultaneous briefing at 10 p.m.
18 THE COURT: No, no, no. I don't think that makes
19 sense, because I don't know what new argument the government is
20 going to make and neither does the defense.
21 MR. ROHRBACH: That makes sense.
22 THE COURT: So I'll say 7 for the government, 10 for
23 the defense.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: That's fine, your Honor.
25 And it may be quick on our side, since it seems to me
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00019122

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document