This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), the prosecution (Mr. Rohrbach), and the defense (Mr. Pagliuca) regarding a briefing schedule that needs to be resolved before the government rests its case. The Judge denies a request for simultaneous briefing and sets a deadline of 7:00 PM for the government and 10:00 PM for the defense.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Representing the government; requesting resolution on a legal matter before the close of the government's case.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (Judge Paul A. Engelmayer based on case number); setting briefing schedules and deadlines.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Representing the defense; agreeing to the briefing schedule set by the court.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referred to by Mr. Rohrbach and The Court.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated by the 'DOJ-OGR' stamp in the footer.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the reporter's name and case context.
|
"I guess the question is so you presumably need resolution before the close of the government's case."Source
"So I'll say 7 for the government, 10 for the defense."Source
"Since we don't know, the government would prefer to brief it tonight."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,492 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document