EFTA00030773.pdf

23.8 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email
File Size: 23.8 KB
Summary

An email dated June 24, 2020, between redacted parties regarding the distribution of revised political 'talking points.' The email includes several attached documents covering topics such as the Border Wall, Global Energy Producers, The Presidential Coalition, the NRA, an AOC investigation, and notably, 'Jeffrey_Epstein_Co-Conspirators'.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of document
Mentioned in attachment filename: 'Jeffrey_Epstein_Co-Conspirators_Talking_Points.v3.docx'
AOC Subject of document
Mentioned in attachment filename: 'AOC_Investigation_Talking_Points.v2.docx' (likely Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)
[Redacted] Sender
Email sender (name and email address redacted)
[Redacted] Recipient
Email recipient (name and email address redacted)

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Global Energy Producers
Mentioned in attachment filename
The Presidential Coalition
Mentioned in attachment filename
NRA
National Rifle Association, mentioned in attachment filename

Key Quotes (2)

"could you possibly substitute these revised talking points for the earlier versions in [Redacted] binder?"
Source
EFTA00030773.pdf
Quote #1
"Attachments: ... Jeffrey_Epstein_Co-Conspirators_Talking_Points.v3.docx"
Source
EFTA00030773.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (616 characters)

From: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
To: "[Redacted]" <[Redacted]>
Subject: FW: Shortened talking points
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 19:46:44 +0000
Attachments: Wall_Talking_Points.v3.docx; Global_Energy_Producers_-_Talking_Points.v3.docx;
Jeffrey_Epstein_Co-Conspirators_Talking_Points.v3.docx;
AOC_Investigation_Talking_Points.v2.docx; The_Presidential_Coalition_-
_Talking_Pointsv3.docx; NRA_Talking_Points.v2.docx
With apologies is this means double work, could you possibly substitute these revised talking points for the earlier versions in [Redacted] binder? I can flag where they go if it's not obvious.
EFTA00030773

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document