DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg

632 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / legal ruling
File Size: 632 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, regarding the denial of bail for Ghislaine Maxwell. The court rules that she is a significant flight risk due to her foreign connections and ability to evade security. The judge dismisses the defense's comparisons to other high-profile cases (Esposito, Dreier, Madoff) as unpersuasive due to factual differences, and notes the defense's argument regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the bail hearing; denied release due to flight risk and foreign connections.
Esposito Case Precedent
Defendant in a cited case used by defense to argue for bail; court distinguished this case from Maxwell's.
Dreier Case Precedent
Defendant in a cited case used by defense to argue for bail.
Bernie Madoff Case Precedent
Defendant in a cited case; court noted Madoff had already been released on an agreed bail package, unlike Maxwell.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Produced the transcript.
The Court
Making the ruling on the bail application.
Defense
Maxwell's attorneys arguing for her release.
Government
Objected to bail in cited cases and presumably in the current case.

Timeline (1 events)

2021-04-01
Court ruling on bail application for Ghislaine Maxwell
Southern District of New York (implied by reporter name)
The Court Ghislaine Maxwell Defense Counsel Government Prosecutors

Relationships (1)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal Comparison Esposito/Dreier/Madoff
Defense cited these defendants as examples of high-profile cases granted bail; the court distinguished Maxwell from them.

Key Quotes (5)

"The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence that no combination of conditions could reasonably assure her presence in court."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg
Quote #1
"Ms. Maxwell possesses significant foreign connections."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg
Quote #2
"The risks are simply too great."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg
Quote #3
"Defense cites a number of cases, including Esposito, Dreier, and Madoff..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg
Quote #4
"Because of these crucial factual differences, the court finds the cases not on point and not persuasive."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001092.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,694 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page151 of 200 88
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 start. Likewise, the possibility that Ms. Maxwell could evade
2 security guards or monitoring is a significant one.
3 The court finds by a preponderance of the evidence
4 that no combination of conditions could reasonably assure her
5 presence in court. The risks are simply too great.
6 Defense cites a number of cases, including Esposito,
7 Dreier, and Madoff, as examples of serious and high-profile
8 prosecutions where the courts, over the government's objection,
9 granted bail to defendants with significant financial
10 resources. But unlike those defendants, Ms. Maxwell possesses
11 significant foreign connections.
12 This case is distinguishable for other reasons, as
13 well. For example, the risk of flight in Esposito appears to
14 have been based on the resources available to defendant, not
15 foreign connections or experience and a record of hiding from
16 being found.
17 In Madoff, the defendant had already been released on
18 a bail package agreed to by the parties for a considerable
19 period of time before the government sought detention. The
20 court there found there were no circumstances in the
21 intervening period showing that the defendant had become a
22 flight risk. Because of these crucial factual differences, the
23 court finds the cases not on point and not persuasive.
24 Finally, in arguing for release, the defense raises
25 the challenges and risks posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001092

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document