This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022, during the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues for the inclusion of specific interrogatory questions (16 and 17) regarding how the witness came to be at Jeffrey Epstein's home and whether she received any money or things of value. The Court sustains an objection regarding 'compound' questions but indicates an inclination to allow question 16.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Subject of the cross-examination (indicated in header).
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Questioning the admissibility of evidence regarding Carolyn's statements.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, ruling on objections and admissibility.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Inquiry |
Mentioned in Question 16 regarding visits to his home.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Addressed by the court regarding potential objections to the evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location mentioned in Interrogatory Question 16.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (1,470 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document