DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg

536 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 536 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between the Judge ('The Court'), defense attorney Mr. Everdell, and prosecutor Ms. Moe regarding jury instructions and the legal definition of the word 'entice,' citing cases such as Almonte, Dupigny, and Broxmeyer. Mr. Everdell notes a technical difficulty with internet access during the proceeding.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Mr. Everdell Defense Attorney
Addressing the court regarding legal definitions and noting technical issues with internet access.
Ms. Moe Prosecutor (Government)
Stating the government has no objection to specific jury instructions.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion regarding jury instructions and legal definitions.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
The Government
Represented by Ms. Moe.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding discussing jury instructions and legal definitions for the term 'entice'.
Courtroom (Southern District of NY)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied jurisdiction based on case number format and reporter name.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Everdell Opposing Counsel Ms. Moe
Transcript dialogue showing defense and prosecution roles.

Key Quotes (3)

""Entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or desire."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg
Quote #1
"Broxmeyer, which is 616 F.3d 120, defined "entice" as "to draw on by exciting hope or desire; allure.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg
Quote #2
"Because I don't have internet access, so I can't pull it up on my computer."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00014690.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,307 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 4 of 29 3121
LCRVMAXT
1 the --
2 MR. EVERDELL: One moment, your Honor.
3 THE COURT: I think it was -- it was the one I was
4 talking about with the issue of causation, but I believe that
5 case also tried to define the words separate and apart from the
6 causation issue.
7 MS. MOE: Your Honor, the government would have no
8 objection to the Court providing the instructions set forth in
9 Almonte and Dupigny.
10 THE COURT: That's the model I have. Those charges, I
11 believe, also provided the language that we did include, which
12 is what the parties agreed on, which is that these words have
13 their ordinary meaning.
14 So on the table derived from Almonte and Dupigny is:
15 "Entice" means to attract, induce, or lure using hope or
16 desire. I think we would also reference them back to the line
17 that you indicated, Ms. Moe.
18 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Just a moment.
20 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I'm sorry.
21 THE COURT: Take your time.
22 MR. EVERDELL: Because I don't have internet access,
23 so I can't pull it up on my computer.
24 THE COURT: Broxmeyer, which is 616 F.3d 120, defined
25 "entice" as "to draw on by exciting hope or desire; allure."
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014690

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document