HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016688.jpg
1020 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Technical report / environmental assessment (conclusion page)
File Size:
1020 KB
Summary
This document is the final page (8 of 8) of a technical report prepared by HSA Engineers & Scientists regarding water quality standards. The report compares water monitoring data from 2006-2008 against November 2008 sampling, concluding that the water delivered to 'the Town' by 'the City' meets Florida Administrative Code standards (F.A.C.), despite occasional chlorine spikes. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R. Fisher, P.G. | Senior Project Manager |
Signatory for the report prepared by HSA Engineers & Scientists.
|
| Thomas Emenhiser | Regional Manager |
Listed on the signature block of the report.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| HSA Engineers & Scientists |
Prepared the water quality report.
|
|
| CRA family of companies |
Parent organization of HSA Engineers & Scientists.
|
|
| US House of Representatives Oversight Committee |
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
November 2008
Relationships (1)
Text states HSA is 'A member of the CRA family of companies'
Key Quotes (2)
"HSA concludes that the quality of the potable water product delivered to the Town by the City meets or beats the criteria for the standards established under rule 62-550, F.A.C."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016688.jpg
Quote #1
"With the exception of the occasional spike in concentrations of DBPRs (and corresponding stronger taste of chlorine in the delivered drinking water)..."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016688.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,179 characters)
Page 8 of 8
Comparison of a three-year average of the concentrations of Primary and Secondary Drinking Water Standards from the City’s annual compliance monitoring events (circa 2006, 2007, and 2008) to the results from HSA’s November 2008 distribution system tap sampling reveals relative equivalence with irrelevant differences between select parameters concentrations since the averaged City results are less than respective MCLs (see Table 1).
With the exception of the occasional spike in concentrations of DBPRs (and corresponding stronger taste of chlorine in the delivered drinking water) resulting from the City’s need to increase the application of sanitizing chemicals (i.e. chlorine) to treat supply water, HSA concludes that the quality of the potable water product delivered to the Town by the City meets or beats the criteria for the standards established under rule 62-550, F.A.C.
Prepared by:
HSA Engineers & Scientists
A member of the CRA family of companies
A member of the CRA family of companies
[Signature]
Michael R. Fisher, P.G.
Senior Project Manager
Senior Project Manager
Thomas Emenhiser
Regional Manager
Regional Manager
Attachments: Figure 1
Table 1
Appendix A – Laboratory Reports of Test Results
Table 1
Appendix A – Laboratory Reports of Test Results
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016688
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document