A page from a letter or memo discussing a political strategy to launch a third-party, 'center-left' candidate for the 2020 US Presidential election. The author argues for using biometric mobile voting technology from Silicon Valley to mobilize moderate voters and expresses skepticism about the Democratic Party's ability to defeat Donald Trump. The document bears a House Oversight stamp, indicating it is part of a congressional investigation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Donald Trump | President / Political Opponent |
Mentioned as the incumbent to be beaten in 2020
|
| Unknown Sender | Author |
Author of the letter proposing a third-party political strategy (signature not visible on this page)
|
| Unknown Recipients | Recipients |
Addressed as "us" and "you" who have "exhaustively war-gamed" the scenario
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House of Representatives |
Mentioned as the body that decides an election if no candidate gets a majority
|
|
| Democrats |
Political party mentioned in the context of the 2020 nomination
|
|
| Silicon Valley |
Mentioned as potential allies for voting technology
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Cited as a source for technology allies
|
"Threading the needle of name ID, a center-left bent, a TV-savvy campaign team and a pledge to serve only four years with an apartisan agenda"Source
"I believe Silicon Valley could be game-changing allies in this effort."Source
"An election that ends up in the House of Representatives is an uncontrollable, murky and ancient process."Source
"But might that be a less scary prospect than relying on the Democrats to nominate a candidate who can beat Trump in 2020?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,574 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document