DOJ-OGR-00010067.jpg

451 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 451 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript involving the questioning of a witness named Edelstein. The line of questioning focuses on an investigation into 'Juror No. 1,' specifically regarding confusion or verification between a 'suspended New York attorney' named Catherine Conrad and the juror, Catherine M. Conrad. The witness denies asking colleague Theresa Trzaskoma for the suspended attorney's middle initial to distinguish between the two individuals.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Deponent
Answering questions regarding an investigation into a juror named Catherine Conrad.
Catherine Conrad Subject of Inquiry
A name shared by two individuals being investigated: a suspended attorney and Juror No. 1.
Catherine M. Conrad Juror No. 1
Identified as 'Juror No. 1' with the middle initial M.
Theresa Trzaskoma Attorney/Colleague
Colleague of the witness who provided names for investigation.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ
Implied by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
Investigation into Juror Identity
New York (Implied)

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned in reference to a 'suspended New York attorney'.

Relationships (1)

Edelstein Professional/Colleagues Theresa Trzaskoma
Witness discusses interactions with Trzaskoma regarding the investigation.

Key Quotes (3)

"Did you ask Theresa Trzaskoma what's the middle initial for the suspended New York attorney?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010067.jpg
Quote #1
"You were aware, were you not, that your firm was in possession of the information showing that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad, correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010067.jpg
Quote #2
"No. We discussed Juror No. 1's responses to the voir dire,"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010067.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,492 characters)

Case 1:20-cv-03388-PAE Document 462-2 Filed 03/24/22 Page 99 of 130
A-5784
327
C2GFDAU3 Edelstein
1 Catherine Conrad, you have another Catherine Conrad. Can you
2 take some simple steps to try to investigate and look to see
3 whether they're the same people? Can you do that?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. And how about this: Can you look to see if they have a
6 similar middle initial? Do you think that that increases the
7 likelihood that you're going to narrow the chances that it's
8 the same people? Would you agree with me that that's the case?
9 A. I mean, if you have the tools. I guess I'm not quite sure
10 what you're asking. If you're doing an investigation, yes, you
11 can look to see whether they have the same middle initial.
12 Q. Did you ask Theresa Trzaskoma what's the middle initial for
13 the suspended New York attorney?
14 A. No, I did not.
15 Q. Did you -- well, withdrawn. You were aware, were you not,
16 that your firm was in possession of the information showing
17 that Juror No. 1 was Catherine with middle initial M. Conrad,
18 correct?
19 A. No, I was not aware of that.
20 Q. So are you telling me that when Theresa Trzaskoma gives you
21 these two different names or two similar names, Catherine
22 Conrad and Catherine Conrad, you didn't suggest to her any
23 steps that she could take to try to determine whether it's the
24 same person?
25 A. No. We discussed Juror No. 1's responses to the voir dire,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010067

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document