HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719.jpg
762 KB
Extraction Summary
0
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Financial analysis report / presentation slide
File Size:
762 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a financial presentation or report, numbered page 39, bearing the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719. It contains three charts (Figures 28, 29, and 30) analyzing central bank data regarding reserve adequacy, import coverage, and foreign currency reserves. While part of a larger production likely related to the House Oversight investigation into Epstein's finances (often involving Deutsche Bank records), this specific page contains only aggregate economic data and no specific names or transaction details.
Organizations (2)
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Key Quotes (4)
"Factors used to calculate reserve adequacy"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719.jpg
Quote #1
"Net increase in foreign currency reserves"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719.jpg
Quote #2
"Level of reserves adequacy"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719.jpg
Quote #3
"Sample comprises of central banks only."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (986 characters)
Fig 28. Factors used to calculate reserve adequacy (% citations)
Rank 1
Rank 2
Rank 3
Rank 4
Import coverage 42 45
Short-term debt coverage 29 33 6 6
GDP coverage 3 6 6
Money supply 19 3 3
Capital flight 3 6 13
Current account deficit 3 6 3
Exchange rate regime 6 3
Rank 1
Rank 2
Rank 3
Rank 4
Import coverage 42 45
Short-term debt coverage 29 33 6 6
GDP coverage 3 6 6
Money supply 19 3 3
Capital flight 3 6 13
Current account deficit 3 6 3
Exchange rate regime 6 3
Sample comprises of central banks only. Key denotes each factors' level of importance according to central banks. Rankings split into four categories in descending order with rank 1=most important. Rating scored as of Q1 of the given year.
Sample=31.
Sample=31.
Fig 29. Net increase in foreign currency reserves (% AUM)
DM High FME
4
DM Low FME
5
EM
18
Sovereigns
58
12
7.5
4.8
1.8
DM High FME
4
DM Low FME
5
EM
18
Sovereigns
58
12
7.5
4.8
1.8
Sample size shown in grey. DM High FME=High financial market dependency. DM Low FME=Low financial market dependency.
Fig 30. Level of reserves adequacy (% citations)
Ample
Sufficient
Insufficient
DM High FME
6
DM Low FME
6
EM
22
67
33
33
67
18
68
14
Ample
Sufficient
Insufficient
DM High FME
6
DM Low FME
6
EM
22
67
33
33
67
18
68
14
Sample comprises of central banks only. Sample size shown in grey.
39
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026719
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document