EFTA00011496.pdf
135 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court order
File Size:
135 KB
Summary
A court order from the Southern District of New York dated June 16, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al. Judge John G. Koeltl orders the plaintiff to pay $13.70 in costs to defendant Ghislane Maxwell, affirming Maxwell as a prevailing party after the plaintiff dismissed the action against her with prejudice.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff |
Plaintiff in the civil case against Indyke and others.
|
| Darren K. Indyke | Defendant |
Named defendant in the case caption.
|
| Ghislane Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant seeking to have costs of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff; declared a prevailing party by the court.
|
| John G. Koeltl | District Judge |
Judge issuing the order.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Venue of the legal action.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2021-06-16
Order issued by Judge John G. Koeltl requiring Plaintiff to pay $13.70 in costs to Ghislane Maxwell.
New York, New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where the order was signed/issued.
|
Relationships (2)
Plaintiff dismissed action with prejudice against Ms. Maxwell; ordered to pay costs to Maxwell.
Case caption: Jane Doe v. Darren K. Indyke, et al.
Key Quotes (3)
"Defendant, Ghislane Maxwell, seeks to have her costs in the amount of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff"Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #1
"This Court previously found that Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party."Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #2
"Because Ms. Maxwell is the prevailing party, the plaintiff should pay the costs in the amount of $13.70."Source
EFTA00011496.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,115 characters)
Case 1:20-cv-00484-JGK-DCF Document 114 Filed 06/16/21 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#
DATE FILED: 6.16.21
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC#
DATE FILED: 6.16.21
JANE DOE
Plaintiff,
Plaintiff,
- against -
DARREN K. INDYKE, ET AL.
Defendants.
Defendants.
20 cv 484 (JGK)
ORDER
JOHN G. KOELTL, District Judge:
Defendant, Ghislane Maxwell, seeks to have her costs in the
amount of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff because the
plaintiff dismissed this action with prejudice against Ms.
Maxwell. The Clerk declined to tax costs because the plaintiff
disputed whether Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party. This Court
previously found that Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party. See
ECF No. 98 at 5. By letter dated June 10, 2021, ECF. No. 113,
counsel for the plaintiff indicated that if the Court is
inclined to grant Ms. Maxwell's request, the plaintiff will send
the plaintiff the $13.70. Because Ms. Maxwell is the prevailing
party, the plaintiff should pay the costs in the amount of
$13.70.
amount of $13.70 taxed against the plaintiff because the
plaintiff dismissed this action with prejudice against Ms.
Maxwell. The Clerk declined to tax costs because the plaintiff
disputed whether Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party. This Court
previously found that Ms. Maxwell was a prevailing party. See
ECF No. 98 at 5. By letter dated June 10, 2021, ECF. No. 113,
counsel for the plaintiff indicated that if the Court is
inclined to grant Ms. Maxwell's request, the plaintiff will send
the plaintiff the $13.70. Because Ms. Maxwell is the prevailing
party, the plaintiff should pay the costs in the amount of
$13.70.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: New York, New York
June 16, 2021
June 16, 2021
John G. Koeltl
United States District Judge
United States District Judge
EFTA00011496
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document