EFTA00027017.pdf
49.4 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
49.4 KB
Summary
This email thread from July 7, 2020, discusses a settlement between Deutsche Bank (DB) and the Department of Financial Services (DFS). The participants discuss press coverage focusing on Jeffrey Epstein's suspicious transactions but speculate the fine is largely due to other money laundering issues. One participant notes that DB provided a comprehensive presentation and documents, asserting that despite press reports, there appears to have been no malfeasance connected to the Epstein accounts.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Parvin | Legal Representative/Attorney |
Described as doing a 'really thorough job' regarding the Deutsche Bank accounts; questioned if she represents the bank.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Interest |
Mentioned in relation to bank accounts, filings, and press coverage regarding suspicious transactions.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Subject of Interest |
Mentioned in 'Maxwell filings' regarding transfers.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Deutsche Bank |
referred to as 'DB' and 'Deutche Bank'; settled with DFS; provided presentation and documents.
|
|
| DFS |
Department of Financial Services; settled with Deutsche Bank.
|
|
| Washington Post |
Source of the article link shared in the email.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Pre-2020-07-07
Relationships (1)
Sender asks 'does Parvin represent them?' and another confirms she has done a 'thorough job'.
Key Quotes (4)
"I share your view that despite the press coverage, there doesn’t appear to have been any malfeasance at all in connection with the Epstein accounts."Source
EFTA00027017.pdf
Quote #1
"DB did an extremely comprehensive presentation to us, and has produced a large amount of documents."Source
EFTA00027017.pdf
Quote #2
"The transactions referenced include transfers we’ve described in both the Epstein and Maxwell filings, among others."Source
EFTA00027017.pdf
Quote #3
"The press coverage is all about Epstein and the ostensibly “suspicious” transactions they processed for him"Source
EFTA00027017.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,719 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: DB/DFS
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 18:01:48 +0000
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: DB/DFS
Date: Tue, 07 Jul 2020 18:01:48 +0000
Okay, good. Thanks.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:53 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: DB/DFS
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 1:53 PM
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: DB/DFS
Yeah we actually already know what it’s referring to – DB did an extremely comprehensive presentation to us, and has produced a large amount of documents. The transactions referenced include transfers we’ve described in both the Epstein and Maxwell filings, among others. We had them run the names of a bunch of people for transfers – see the attached email and its attachment – and they also did a summary chart of his accounts, also attached. And yeah it’s Parvin, she’s done a really thorough job. I share your view that despite the press coverage, there doesn’t appear to have been any malfeasance at all in connection with the Epstein accounts.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 13:44
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: DB/DFS
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2020 13:44
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: DB/DFS
Looks like DFS settled with Deutche Bank yesterday. The press coverage is all about Epstein and the ostensibly “suspicious” transactions they processed for him, but if I’m a betting man, I’m betting the bulk of the resolution is based on the last sentence of the article: “The fine also covered the German bank’s connection to a massive money laundering scheme and other improper activity.”
https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2020/07/07/deutsche-bank-fined-150-million-relationship-with-jeffrey-epstein-other-lapses/
Anyway, maybe worth seeing if you can pull the public settlement docs to see what the allegedly suspicious transactions entailed. Or you can go straight to the bank, I suppose. Remind me, does Parvin represent them?
EFTA00027017
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document