EFTA00031115.pdf
46 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
46 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from November 24, 2021, between unidentified legal professionals (likely DOJ prosecutors) regarding legal strategy. They are discussing a request for briefing materials to counter defense counsel's attempt to call numerous agents to testify in an effort to 'impeach the investigation.' One participant notes they are dealing with this same issue in the 'Maxwell' case (Ghislaine Maxwell) and shares a ruling from Judge Nathan (AJN) and relevant motions in limine (MIL).
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant (implied) |
Mentioned in email: "We've been dealing with this in Maxwell."
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
Issued a "decent oral ruling" regarding the defense attacking the investigation; referred to as "AJN" (Alison J. Nath...
|
| AJN | Judge |
Acronym for Judge Alison J. Nathan. Her ruling is referenced in the attachments.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government / DOJ |
Implied by the context of 'Government_MIL' attachments and the discussion of prosecuting strategy.
|
|
| Defense Counsel |
Mentioned as the party attempting to call numerous agents to trial.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Relationships (2)
Prosecutors citing a 'decent oral ruling' from Judge Nathan in the Maxwell case.
Sender
→
Colleagues
→
Recipient
Sharing legal briefs and strategies regarding trial responses.
Key Quotes (3)
"We've been dealing with this in Maxwell."Source
EFTA00031115.pdf
Quote #1
"Something maybe akin to — you can't put the investigation on trial."Source
EFTA00031115.pdf
Quote #2
"Attached is our MIL briefing, which include sections seeking to preclude the defense from attacking the investigation."Source
EFTA00031115.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,390 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:23:00 +0000
Attachments: Government_MIL_[final,_unredacted].pdf; Govt_Reply_Brief_[unredacted].pdf;
2021.11.01_Final_pretrial_conference.PDF
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:23:00 +0000
Attachments: Government_MIL_[final,_unredacted].pdf; Govt_Reply_Brief_[unredacted].pdf;
2021.11.01_Final_pretrial_conference.PDF
Sorry for the delay! Attached is our MIL briefing, which include sections seeking to preclude the defense from attacking the investigation. AJN's ruling on the issue is on pages 15 through 30 of the attached transcript.
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:10 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:10 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
Amazing, thanks!
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:09 AM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
Sent: Wednesday, November 24, 2021 11:09 AM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: ISO response to defense calling many, many agents
We've been dealing with this in Maxwell. We have some briefing and a decent oral ruling from Judge Nathan on this. Will send when I'm at my desk.
On Nov 24, 2021, at 11:02 AM [Redacted] wrote:
Good morning all,
Anyone have briefing in response to defense counsel's efforts to call at trial numerous (here, 7) agents involved in the investigation, to varying degrees, in an effort to impeach the investigation? Something maybe akin to — you can't put the investigation on trial.
(They've provided a Touhy letter, so not looking for that).
Thank you!
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00031115
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document