DOJ-OGR-00017772.jpg
595 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript page
File Size:
595 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript (likely a criminal trial) where attorneys and the judge are discussing the phrasing of a question regarding a witness named Jane. The discussion focuses on differentiating between Jane's understanding at the time she began cooperating with the government versus her current testimony, specifically concerning her financial stake and resolved civil matters.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | ||
| Ms. Menninger | ||
| The Court |
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Government | ||
| DOJ |
Timeline (3 events)
Trial testimony
Civil case settlement
Meeting with the government
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
Relationships (3)
→
→
→
→
to
→
→
Key Quotes (3)
"Jane has testified on direct that her understanding is she has no financial stake in the outcome of this case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017772.jpg
Quote #1
"The civil matter is resolved and the verdict in this case won't affect what she's received from those settlements."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017772.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: Can you just give us the specific question."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017772.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,495 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 163 of 264 574
LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross
LC1VMAX5 Jane - cross
1 Just to facilitate clarity with respect to the
2 threshold question here about the witness, about her
3 understanding if the question is phrased as her understanding
4 about testifying at trial today and the effect of a civil case,
5 I think the answer to that question has to be no because there
6 is no civil case, there is no pending claim, it's all been
7 resolved.
8 And so I just wanted to clarify whether the question
9 is at the time she started meeting with the government was that
10 her understanding, while the case was active, or whether the
11 question will be about her testimony here at trial.
12 Jane has testified on direct that her understanding is
13 she has no financial stake in the outcome of this case. The
14 civil matter is resolved and the verdict in this case won't
15 affect what she's received from those settlements. And so I
16 just wanted to clarify in terms of how that question is phrased
17 and what we're getting at about the issue about testifying at
18 trial or her initial decision to cooperate with the government.
19 THE COURT: Fair enough.
20 MS. MENNINGER: That's fair.
21 In the paragraph itself it refers to cooperating with
22 the case and it refers to testifying. So I think any reason to
23 believe either one of those --
24 THE COURT: Can you just give us the specific
25 question.
2 threshold question here about the witness, about her
3 understanding if the question is phrased as her understanding
4 about testifying at trial today and the effect of a civil case,
5 I think the answer to that question has to be no because there
6 is no civil case, there is no pending claim, it's all been
7 resolved.
8 And so I just wanted to clarify whether the question
9 is at the time she started meeting with the government was that
10 her understanding, while the case was active, or whether the
11 question will be about her testimony here at trial.
12 Jane has testified on direct that her understanding is
13 she has no financial stake in the outcome of this case. The
14 civil matter is resolved and the verdict in this case won't
15 affect what she's received from those settlements. And so I
16 just wanted to clarify in terms of how that question is phrased
17 and what we're getting at about the issue about testifying at
18 trial or her initial decision to cooperate with the government.
19 THE COURT: Fair enough.
20 MS. MENNINGER: That's fair.
21 In the paragraph itself it refers to cooperating with
22 the case and it refers to testifying. So I think any reason to
23 believe either one of those --
24 THE COURT: Can you just give us the specific
25 question.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017772
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document