HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238.jpg

Extraction Summary

6
People
6
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt / memoir page (produced in house oversight investigation)
File Size:
Summary

This document is a page from a memoir (likely Ehud Barak's) produced as part of a House Oversight investigation. The text details Barak's reflection on his political defeat, the loss of support from the Labor Party and Arab citizens following the Galilee clashes, and the failure of peace negotiations with Yasser Arafat. It concludes with the results of the election where Ariel Sharon ('Arik') defeated Barak.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Author / Narrator / Former Prime Minister of Israel
Reflecting on his election loss, the Intifada, and negotiations with Arafat.
Yasser Arafat Palestinian Authority President
Described as rejecting peace terms and not being prepared to commit to assurances.
Yossi Beilin Labor Party Veteran / Negotiator
Mentioned as someone Barak was accused of excluding from negotiations.
Tom Segev Journalist and Historian
Quoted from Ha'aretz criticizing Barak's arrogance.
Ariel Sharon Politician / Prime Minister Elect
Referred to as 'Arik'; won the election decisively with over 62% of the vote.
Benjamin Netanyahu Politician / Former Prime Minister
Referred to as 'Bibi'; mentioned in comparison to election margins.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
Labor Party
Barak's political party, described as abandoning support for him.
Knesset
Israeli Parliament; Arab members mentioned regarding incitement of violence.
Israeli Police
Criticized for being unprepared and using excessive force in the Galilee.
Ha'aretz
Newspaper where Tom Segev published his criticism.
Palestinian Authority
Governing body led by Arafat.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238'.

Timeline (3 events)

1999 (implied)
General Election (Barak's landslide victory)
Israel
Ehud Barak Benjamin Netanyahu (Bibi)
February 2001 (implied)
Prime Ministerial Election
Israel
Ehud Barak Ariel Sharon (Arik)
October 2000 (implied)
Clashes in the Galilee / Start of the new intifada
Galilee
Israeli Police Arab citizens of Israel

Locations (3)

Location Context
Country governed by the narrator.
Location of clashes at the start of the new intifada.
Territory discussed regarding Wye redeployments and Arafat's control.

Relationships (3)

Ehud Barak Adversarial / Negotiating Yasser Arafat
Discusses failed peace talks and Arafat's rejection of terms.
Ehud Barak Political Opponent Ariel Sharon
Discusses losing the election to 'Arik'.
Ehud Barak Critic Tom Segev
Segev wrote a broadside accusing Barak of arrogance.

Key Quotes (4)

"I, as Prime Minister, was ultimately responsible, and I formally apologized for what had happened."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238.jpg
Quote #1
"Rather than continue on the Oslo road, Barak put it into his head that he could reach a final settlement and try and impose it on the Palestinian Authority President."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238.jpg
Quote #2
"I did not try to “impose” anything on Arafat."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238.jpg
Quote #3
"In percentage terms, Arik’s victory was even more decisive than mine over Bibi. He got more than 62 percent of the vote. I received barely 37 percent."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,751 characters)

/ BARAK / 104
I did regret being unable to rely on the support of two key constituencies that had helped deliver my landslide victory barely 18 months earlier: my own Labor Party and the Arab citizens of Israel. I had no trouble understanding the reasons many Israeli Arabs were abandoning me. The clashes in the Galilee at the start of the new intifada had left more than a dozen of their community dead. As an official inquiry would later conclude, there was blame on all sides. A number of Arab members of the Knesset had played a part in inciting the violence. Yet the police had been unprepared, and they had used excessive force. As I said publicly before the election, I, as Prime Minister, was ultimately responsible, and I formally apologized for what had happened. Yet the roots went deeper, to the economic and social disadvantages still faced by many Arab citizens, and the difficulty in resolving those problems calmly and collectively as long as Israel remained in a state of war with its Arab neighbors.
For Labor and the political left, it was as if, despite Arafat’s repeated rejections of ever more forthcoming terms of peace, they still couldn’t bring themselves to believe he really meant it. By default, they were inclined to blame me for not delivering peace. I was accused of relying too much on a close circle of aides and negotiators I’d known from my time in the army, of not giving a negotiating role to Labor veterans of the Oslo negotiations like Yossi Beilin, and of being insufficiently sensitive to Arafat’s needs in the negotiating process. Typical of the argument was a broadside by the journalist and historian Tom Segev, in Ha’aretz, which accused me of an “incredible arrogance” which had “led to an historic mistake. Rather than continue on the Oslo road, Barak put it into his head that he could reach a final settlement and try and impose it on the Palestinian Authority President.” I did not try to “impose” anything on Arafat. I did, quite consciously, abandon the “Oslo road” because it was inexorably leading to a situation where, after the final Wye redeployments, Arafat would have control over the great majority of the West Bank without having to commit to any of the assurances that even most on the Israeli left would define as the minimum required for peace. Now, of course, we knew that was something the Palestinian leader was not prepared to do.
When election day came, not that many of my critics on the left actually voted against me. Nor did the Israeli Arabs. Yet in very large numbers, they simply didn’t vote. In percentage terms, Arik’s victory was even more decisive than mine over Bibi. He got more than 62 percent of the vote. I received barely 37 percent.
390
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_028238

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document