DOJ-OGR-00015015.jpg
532 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
532 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on January 15, 2025. It depicts the cross-examination of a witness named Rocchio by defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding an article written in 2006 by Ms. Craven. The questioning focuses on the academic understanding of the term 'sexual grooming of children,' specifically highlighting a quote stating that the phenomenon is not clearly understood in the public domain.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Being cross-examined regarding an article on grooming; name appears in header 'Rocchio - Cross'
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination; distributing copies of the article
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor (Government) |
Requesting a copy of the document being introduced
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the interaction regarding document distribution
|
| The Clerk | Court Staff |
Receiving copies of the document
|
| Ms. Craven | Author |
Author of the 2006 article being discussed regarding sexual grooming
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by The Court ('The government needs a copy')
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated in footer DOJ-OGR-00015015)
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown (Trial Date)
Cross-examination of witness Rocchio regarding the 'Craven article' and the definition of grooming.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on case number 1:20-cr-00330 (USA v. Maxwell)
|
Relationships (2)
Pagliuca is cross-examining Rocchio.
The Court states 'The government needs a copy' in response to Pomerantz asking for one.
Key Quotes (3)
"Q. And in the introduction, Ms. Craven says that this phenomenon of grooming is little -- 'there is little understanding about this phenomenon' correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00015015.jpg
Quote #1
"Q. May we go to page 11, to the conclusion. 'Despite the wide acceptance of the term, sexual grooming of children is not understood clearly, particularly in the public domain.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00015015.jpg
Quote #2
"MS. POMERANTZ: May I have a copy? THE COURT: The government needs a copy."Source
DOJ-OGR-00015015.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,322 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 782 Filed 01/15/25 Page 139 of 158 139
LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross
LBAAMAX5ps Rocchio - Cross
1 which is this article. If I may approach your clerk and give
2 your clerk some copies.
3 THE COURT: That's fine.
4 MS. POMERANTZ: May I have a copy?
5 THE COURT: The government needs a copy.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. I've got copies for everybody.
7 THE CLERK: Do you have another copy? Do you have an
8 extra copy for us?
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do.
10 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
11 Q. This is, as you identified, the Craven article, correct?
12 A. It is.
13 Q. And in the introduction, Ms. Craven says that this
14 phenomenon of grooming is little -- "there is little
15 understanding about this phenomenon" correct?
16 A. Where are you reading from? I'm sorry.
17 Q. Introduction, middle of the page. Fourth line down.
18 A. "About this phenomenon." Yes.
19 Q. And that's the ultimate conclusion of this article,
20 understanding that it was written in 2006. Right?
21 A. And whether it was the ultimate conclusion, that is
22 something that they posit in the introduction, yes.
23 Q. May we go to page 11, to the conclusion. "Despite the wide
24 acceptance of the term, sexual grooming of children is not
25 understood clearly, particularly in the public domain." Do you
2 your clerk some copies.
3 THE COURT: That's fine.
4 MS. POMERANTZ: May I have a copy?
5 THE COURT: The government needs a copy.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. I've got copies for everybody.
7 THE CLERK: Do you have another copy? Do you have an
8 extra copy for us?
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: I do.
10 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
11 Q. This is, as you identified, the Craven article, correct?
12 A. It is.
13 Q. And in the introduction, Ms. Craven says that this
14 phenomenon of grooming is little -- "there is little
15 understanding about this phenomenon" correct?
16 A. Where are you reading from? I'm sorry.
17 Q. Introduction, middle of the page. Fourth line down.
18 A. "About this phenomenon." Yes.
19 Q. And that's the ultimate conclusion of this article,
20 understanding that it was written in 2006. Right?
21 A. And whether it was the ultimate conclusion, that is
22 something that they posit in the introduction, yes.
23 Q. May we go to page 11, to the conclusion. "Despite the wide
24 acceptance of the term, sexual grooming of children is not
25 understood clearly, particularly in the public domain." Do you
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00015015
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document