This document is a page from a court transcript filed on August 10, 2022, related to Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell case). The Judge and attorneys (Moe, Menninger, Sternheim) discuss balancing public access with necessary redactions and establish time limits for upcoming arguments, with the government requesting up to 2.5 hours. Attorney Sternheim shares a brief anecdote about Judge Motley to contextualize strict time limits.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, managing scheduling and redaction discussions.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Government) |
Representing the government, discussing time estimates for arguments.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
Asking for confirmation regarding timing.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Made a suggestion regarding scheduling; shares an anecdote about Judge Motley.
|
| Judge Motley | Judge (Historical) |
Mentioned in an anecdote by Ms. Sternheim regarding strict time limits.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| DOJ |
"balanced against the need to provide public access to what will occur in court with appropriate tailored redactions."Source
"Somewhere between two and two and a half hours, your Honor."Source
"It won't be more than two and a half."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,273 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document