DOJ-OGR-00009121.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court filing (table of contents)
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is the Table of Contents for a court filing (Document 615) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on February 24, 2022. The filing appears to be the Government's response arguing against the Defendant's motion for a new trial, specifically addressing issues surrounding 'Juror 50' regarding their questionnaire, voir dire, and post-verdict public statements. The outline proposes a limited hearing to question Juror 50 while arguing that the defense has not met the legal standards (McDonough test) to warrant a new trial.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror 50 | Juror |
Subject of a motion for a new trial due to questionnaire answers and public statements.
|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Filed a motion for a new trial; referenced in the case number 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (Ghislaine Maxwell).
|
| McDonough | Legal Precedent Namesake |
Referenced in legal standard 'McDonough Power Equipment, Inc. v. Greenwood' regarding juror misconduct.
|
Relationships (1)
Document discusses Defendant's motion regarding Juror 50's conduct.
Key Quotes (4)
"The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009121.jpg
Quote #1
"The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009121.jpg
Quote #2
"The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009121.jpg
Quote #3
"There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness"Source
DOJ-OGR-00009121.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,494 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 615 Filed 02/24/22 Page 2 of 49
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ......................................................................................... 1
BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................... 2
I. The Jury Selection Process.............................................................................................. 2
II. Juror 50’s Questionnaire and Voir Dire ........................................................................ 6
III. Juror 50’s Public Statements Following the Verdict ..................................................... 8
ARGUMENT ........................................................................................................................ 10
I. The Defendant’s Motion for a New Trial Should Be Denied on the Current Record............ 10
A. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................ 10
B. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 13
1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough ...................... 13
2. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough .................. 19
A. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................ 10
B. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 13
1. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the First Prong of McDonough ...................... 13
2. The Defendant Has Failed To Satisfy the Second Prong of McDonough .................. 19
II. The Court Should Schedule a Limited Hearing Regarding Juror 50 ............................. 30
A. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................ 30
B. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 31
1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ............................................................ 32
2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited.......................................................... 33
3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness ......................................... 37
4. The Defendant’s “Discovery” Request Should Be Denied ...................................... 40
A. Applicable Law ............................................................................................................ 30
B. Discussion ................................................................................................................... 31
1. The Court Should Conduct the Questioning ............................................................ 32
2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited.......................................................... 33
3. There Is No Basis to Call Any Other Juror as a Witness ......................................... 37
4. The Defendant’s “Discovery” Request Should Be Denied ...................................... 40
III. The Court Should Provide Juror 50 with a Copy of His Questionnaire
Before Any Hearing..................................................................................................... 42
Before Any Hearing..................................................................................................... 42
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................... 47
2
DOJ-OGR-00009121
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document