DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg

743 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing / legal brief (opposition to bail)
File Size: 743 KB
Summary

This page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) argues against granting bail to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The prosecution details her sophisticated efforts to evade detection in the year prior to her arrest, including purchasing a home through a trust, using aliases with real estate agents, and holding assets/credit cards under false names. The document asserts these actions prove she is a flight risk capable of assuming a new identity.

People (4)

Name Role Context
The Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) Defendant
Subject of the bail hearing; accused of sophisticated hiding techniques, using aliases, and concealing assets.
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Associate
Mentioned regarding the 'media frenzy that followed Epstein’s death'.
Real Estate Agent Witness/Professional
Person to whom the defendant introduced herself under an alias.
The Court Judicial Body
Previously denied bail and noted the defendant's ability to avoid detection.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
The Court
Reviewing the bail application.
DOJ
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-12-18
Filing of Document 100-2 in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN
Court
The Court The Defendant
Prior to document
Epstein's death
Unknown
Year leading up to arrest
Defendant living in isolation and hiding assets
Unknown hiding location
The Defendant

Locations (2)

Location Context
Where the defendant has property and loved ones.
Property purchased by the defendant while hiding.

Relationships (2)

The Defendant Associate Jeffrey Epstein
Reference to the 'media frenzy that followed Epstein’s death'.
The Defendant Personal Family and Friends/Loved Ones
Defendant's willingness to cut herself off from them to avoid detection.

Key Quotes (4)

"The strong possibility that the defendant could successfully resist extradition only heightens the defendant’s incentive to flee."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg
Quote #1
"She did so by purchasing a home using a trust in another name and introducing herself to the real estate agent under an alias..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg
Quote #2
"...registering cellphones and at least one credit card under other names..."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg
Quote #3
"...that course of conduct clearly establishes her expertise at remaining hidden and her willingness to cut herself off from her family and friends in order to avoid detection."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001165.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,199 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 100-2 Filed 12/18/20 Page 23 of 36
complicated, and expensive process, which would provide no measure of justice to the victims who would be forced to wait years for the defendant’s return. The strong possibility that the defendant could successfully resist extradition only heightens the defendant’s incentive to flee.
Second, the defendant’s behavior in the year leading up to her arrest demonstrates her sophistication in hiding and her ability to avoid detection. The Court noted as much in denying bail, and the Renewed Bail Application also does nothing to change that conclusion. (Tr. 87). Indeed, the defendant’s time in isolation in the year leading up to her arrest makes clear that, even to the extent she has loved ones and property in this country, she has proven her willingness to cut herself off entirely from them and her ability to live in hiding. She did so by purchasing a home using a trust in another name and introducing herself to the real estate agent under an alias, placing her assets into accounts held under other names, registering cellphones and at least one credit card under other names, and living in near total isolation away from her loved ones.
The Renewed Bail Application again tries to cast those steps as efforts to avoid the media frenzy that followed Epstein’s death. (Tr. 44, 56-57). However, as the Court already recognized, regardless of the defendant’s reasons for taking these steps, that course of conduct clearly establishes her expertise at remaining hidden and her willingness to cut herself off from her family and friends in order to avoid detection. (Tr. 87). Rare is the case when a defendant has already demonstrated an aptitude for assuming another identity and concealing her assets, including when purchasing property, registering cellphones, and managing finances. Here, the defendant has indisputably taken all of those steps. She was able to do so because of both her finances and her willingness to take extreme measures and to experience social isolation away from her loved ones. And she was so good at assuming another identity that she was able to avoid notice by locals and
20
DOJ-OGR-00001165

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document