DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
530 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
530 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) dated August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim discusses two exhibits (823 and 824) with the Judge. Exhibit 823 concerns the employment start date of Sky Roberts around the year 2000, while Exhibit 824 is an insurance document listing Sky Roberts' dependents, specifically naming his daughter, Virginia Roberts. The defense argues these are not proper business records as the employee Ms. Gill, who might testify to them, did not start employment until 2007.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding the admissibility and content of exhibits 823 and 824.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions about the documents and individuals involved.
|
| Sky Roberts | Subject of Document |
Subject of employment and insurance documents (Exhibits 823 and 824); father of Virginia Roberts.
|
| Janine Gill | Employee/Witness |
Mentioned as an individual who did not prepare the document; started employment in 2007.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Dependent/Daughter |
Listed as a daughter/dependent on Sky Roberts' insurance document.
|
| Sky Roberts' Wife | Dependent |
Mentioned as a dependent on the insurance document (unnamed).
|
| Sky Roberts' Son | Dependent |
Mentioned as a dependent on the insurance document (unnamed).
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by the footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2000
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court based on the reporter's name.
|
Relationships (2)
Transcript states document 824 indicates 'the daughter by the name of Virginia Roberts'.
Ms. Gill is discussed in the context of record keeping regarding Sky Roberts' employment documents, though she started later (2007).
Key Quotes (4)
"823 is a personal action notice that indicates --"Source
DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
Quote #1
"So this document concerns the start date of employment of an individual named Sky Roberts."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
Quote #2
"The second document, 824, is a document concerning insurance for Sky Roberts that indicates his dependents, his wife, his son, and the daughter by the name of Virginia Roberts."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
Quote #3
"That is not a proper business record."Source
DOJ-OGR-00013287.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,436 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 262 1714
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 introduce it in a redacted form.
2 823 is a personal action notice that indicates --
3 THE COURT: Can I see them while we're talking about
4 them?
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Sure. May I hand it up to you?
6 THE COURT: Sure.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: I think I've given you one redacted
8 and one not, but I can give you a whole --
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: So this document concerns the start
11 date of employment of an individual named Sky Roberts. It was
12 not prepared by this individual and she has no personal
13 knowledge as to how it was prepared.
14 THE COURT: When you say it wasn't prepared by this
15 individual, you mean by --
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Ms. Gill.
17 THE COURT: By Janine Gill?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes. She started her employment in
19 2007. This document concerns 2000.
20 There is nothing in the record concerning an
21 individual named Sky Roberts. The second document, 824, is a
22 document concerning insurance for Sky Roberts that indicates
23 his dependents, his wife, his son, and the daughter by the name
24 of Virginia Roberts.
25 That is not a proper business record. It has nothing
2 823 is a personal action notice that indicates --
3 THE COURT: Can I see them while we're talking about
4 them?
5 MS. STERNHEIM: Sure. May I hand it up to you?
6 THE COURT: Sure.
7 MS. STERNHEIM: I think I've given you one redacted
8 and one not, but I can give you a whole --
9 THE COURT: Okay.
10 MS. STERNHEIM: So this document concerns the start
11 date of employment of an individual named Sky Roberts. It was
12 not prepared by this individual and she has no personal
13 knowledge as to how it was prepared.
14 THE COURT: When you say it wasn't prepared by this
15 individual, you mean by --
16 MS. STERNHEIM: Ms. Gill.
17 THE COURT: By Janine Gill?
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes. She started her employment in
19 2007. This document concerns 2000.
20 There is nothing in the record concerning an
21 individual named Sky Roberts. The second document, 824, is a
22 document concerning insurance for Sky Roberts that indicates
23 his dependents, his wife, his son, and the daughter by the name
24 of Virginia Roberts.
25 That is not a proper business record. It has nothing
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013287
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document