HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
1.05 MB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
1.05 MB
Summary
An email chain from June 2017 involving Jeffrey Epstein, journalist Michael Wolff, and PR consultant Matthew Hiltzik. Hiltzik sent Epstein a list of vetting questions regarding his professional background and validators. Wolff discusses a 'friendly lunch' with the prospect of gaining 'Trump info' and comments on the briefing material.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Wolff | Journalist/Author |
Email sender; discussing a 'friendly lunch' and potential 'Trump info' with Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey E. (Jeffrey Epstein) | Recipient/Sender |
Using email jeevacation@gmail.com; asking for thoughts on PR questions; commenting on 'Christie'.
|
| Matthew Hiltzik | PR/Communications Consultant |
Original sender of the forwarded message containing interview preparation questions.
|
| Ben Sosenko | CC Recipient |
Copied on the original email from Hiltzik.
|
| Christie | Politician (implied Chris Christie) |
Mentioned by Epstein: 'Christie back in'.
|
| Trump | Politician (Donald Trump) |
Mentioned by Wolff regarding the 'prospect of some Trump info'.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Document footer indicates 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Unspecified (Future relative to 6/8/2017)
Friendly lunch with prospect of Trump info
Unspecified
Michael Wolff
Unspecified (possibly 'him' referring to Hiltzik or a third party)
Relationships (2)
Wolff advising Epstein on how to handle the 'brief' and offering to clarify issues.
Hiltzik sending professional bio/interview prep questions to Epstein.
Key Quotes (5)
"Christie back in"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
Quote #1
"A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
Quote #2
"It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
Quote #3
"Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf on the record?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
Quote #4
"Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf off the record?"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,342 characters)
From: Michael Wolff [REDACTED]
Sent: 6/8/2017 9:07:00 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: some questions...
Sent: 6/8/2017 9:07:00 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: some questions...
Importance: High
As...?
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:05 PM jeffrey E. wrote:
Christie back in
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 5:05 PM jeffrey E. wrote:
Christie back in
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 1:52 PM Michael Wolff <[REDACTED]> wrote:
A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief. If there's any issues you'd like me to clarify with him or explore, lemme know. It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info.
A bit tone deaf, but a reasonable basis for creating a brief. If there's any issues you'd like me to clarify with him or explore, lemme know. It's just a friendly lunch, with the prospect of some Trump info.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 4:48 PM jeffrey E. wrote:
Thoughts
--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Matthew Hiltzik <[REDACTED]>
Date: Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM
Subject: some questions...
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: Ben Sosenko <[REDACTED]>
Thoughts
--------- Forwarded message ---------
From: Matthew Hiltzik <[REDACTED]>
Date: Wed, Jun 7, 2017 at 2:37 PM
Subject: some questions...
To: jeffrey E.
Cc: Ben Sosenko <[REDACTED]>
Attached and below please find some initial questions for you...
Looking forward to connecting over the next two days...
1. Please provide a brief overview of your professional background?
2. Who were your mentors? Do you keep in touch with any of them?
3. What are your 5 best professional achievements?
4. Who are some of your business partners?
5. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf on the record?
6. Who are third-party validators who would speak on your behalf off the record?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_026131
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document