This document is page 207 of a court transcript (Jury Charge) from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on August 10, 2022. It details 'Instruction No. 29' regarding 'Count Six: Sex trafficking of an individual under the age of 18.' The judge instructs the jury that the consent or willingness of the victim, identified specifically as 'Carolyn,' is not a valid defense if she was under 18. The text also outlines the 'Fourth element' of the charge, defining 'interstate commerce' and the government's burden of proof regarding Maxwell's conduct affecting it.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Victim / Minor |
Mentioned as the subject of Count Six; specific instruction that her consent or willingness is irrelevant if she was ...
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Ghislaine Maxwell; mentioned in the context of the government proving she recruited, enticed, harbored, or transporte...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced as the party that must prove the elements of the crime.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
"It's not relevant whether or not Carolyn was a willing participant in performing commercial sex acts when she was under the age of 18 years old."Source
"Consent by the person is not a defense to the charge in Count Six of the indictment if Carolyn was under the age of 18 at the time the commercial sex acts took place."Source
"Instruction No. 29. Count Six. Sex trafficking of an individual under the age of 18."Source
"The fourth and final element of Count Six which the government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt is that Ms. Maxwell's conduct was in interstate commerce or affected interstate commerce."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,569 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document