This is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely US v. Maxwell) featuring the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on an intake interview from September 2005 and a signed document from October 2005, specifically regarding the witness's reported use of benzodiazepines. The witness repeatedly challenges the attorney on the relevance of these 2005 documents to the 2002-2003 timeframe originally being discussed.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Under cross-examination, questioning the relevance of a 2005 document to the 2002-2003 timeframe.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination regarding an intake interview and drug use.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the trial, asking for the exhibit to be enlarged.
|
| Intake Interviewer | Interviewer |
Person who interviewed Carolyn on 9/16/2005.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
"Sir, this document that you're showing me was taken on 9/16/2005. So what does that have to do with the time frame you're asking me?"Source
"Yes, but what does that have to do with the year 2002 and 2003?"Source
"Do you recall telling the intake interviewer that you were using benzodiazepines?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,279 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document