This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) before the Judge regarding the potential need for attorney testimony and stipulations. Ms. Menninger notes that the defense witness list may include attorneys' names marked with asterisks subject to court approval.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Speaking to the court regarding discussions with the defense; likely AUSA Alison Moe.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney (Defense) |
Speaking to the court regarding witness lists and potential stipulations; likely Laura Menninger (counsel for Ghislai...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referred to by Ms. Menninger regarding conferring on issues.
|
|
| DOJ |
Indicated in the Bates stamp (Department of Justice).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely SDNY (Southern District of New York) based on the court reporters.
|
"I think in the press of business over the last 24 hours, that has not yet been discussed between the two sides."Source
"We're not in a position to make a representation about our position at this juncture"Source
"There are other matters that may give rise to the need for attorney testimony or probably more likely a stipulation about similar issues."Source
"our witness list may have other attorneys' names on them that have an asterisk by it"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,503 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document