You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

DOJ-OGR-00016473.jpg

598 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 598 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. It records a discussion between Ms. Moe (Prosecution) and Ms. Menninger (Defense) before the Judge regarding the potential need for attorney testimony and stipulations. Ms. Menninger notes that the defense witness list may include attorneys' names marked with asterisks subject to court approval.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Moe Attorney (Prosecution)
Speaking to the court regarding discussions with the defense; likely AUSA Alison Moe.
Ms. Menninger Attorney (Defense)
Speaking to the court regarding witness lists and potential stipulations; likely Laura Menninger (counsel for Ghislai...
The Court Judge
Presiding over the proceedings.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
The Government
Referred to by Ms. Menninger regarding conferring on issues.
DOJ
Indicated in the Bates stamp (Department of Justice).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Court proceeding filing date (transcript likely from earlier trial date)
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely SDNY (Southern District of New York) based on the court reporters.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Moe Opposing Counsel Ms. Menninger
Discussing conferring with one another regarding witness lists and stipulations.

Key Quotes (4)

"I think in the press of business over the last 24 hours, that has not yet been discussed between the two sides."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016473.jpg
Quote #1
"We're not in a position to make a representation about our position at this juncture"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016473.jpg
Quote #2
"There are other matters that may give rise to the need for attorney testimony or probably more likely a stipulation about similar issues."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016473.jpg
Quote #3
"our witness list may have other attorneys' names on them that have an asterisk by it"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016473.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,503 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 257 of 267 2285
LCAVMAX8
1 suggested. I think in the press of business over the last 24
2 hours, that has not yet been discussed between the two sides.
3 MS. MOE: That's correct, your Honor.
4 We haven't had a chance to confer about that issue.
5 We have begun discussing that internally and are thinking
6 through that carefully. We're not in a position to make a
7 representation about our position at this juncture, but that's
8 very much top of mind and we'll be working diligently on that
9 issue over the break.
10 THE COURT: Okay.
11 MS. MENNINGER: And just as a preview, your Honor,
12 there may be some others like that. As your Honor is aware,
13 things came up during the course of testimony, and we will
14 confer with the government about that with respect to other
15 attorneys as well.
16 MS. MOE: I'm sorry, your Honor. I'm not sure I'm
17 following that.
18 MS. MENNINGER: There are other matters that may give
19 rise to the need for attorney testimony or probably more likely
20 a stipulation about similar issues. And we would like to
21 confer with the government first before briefing them. But I
22 wouldn't -- our witness list may have other attorneys' names on
23 them that have an asterisk by it saying subject to briefing and
24 approval by the Court. I don't want anyone to believe we
25 haven't understood the Court's prior statements on this topic.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016473

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document