HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg

3.43 MB

Extraction Summary

12
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Correspondence / letter (draft or copy)
File Size: 3.43 MB
Summary

This document is a contentious letter, likely from Jeffrey Epstein to Leon Black, discussing the mismanagement of Black's financial office. Epstein defends his 'architecture' of Black's finances, criticizes Black's employee Eileen for incompetence and insubordination, and justifies his high fees by citing the 'dire circumstances' he resolved (including a $30 million issue involving 'Carlyn'). The letter highlights Epstein's deep involvement in Black's tax and estate planning ('GRAT administrator', 'art partnership') and asserts that despite their friendship, Epstein will no longer work for free.

People (12)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Sender (implied)
Author of the letter, discussing his 'architecture' work, fees, and management of the recipient's affairs.
Leon Black Recipient (implied)
Referred to as 'Leon' by Eileen in the text ('Leon said', 'Leon's desk'). The sender calls him a 'very close friend'.
Larry Delson Proposed Manager
Suggested by sender to 'take charge' as a stopgap measure.
Eileen Employee
Current employee of the recipient; criticized heavily by the sender for providing bad info and obfuscation.
Ada Administrator
Suggested to be only a 'trust, grat administrator'.
Rich Controller
Recipient's controller.
Tom Employee/Advisor
Involved in tax characterization; sender dismisses him as the 'last word' on the subject.
Suydam Associate
Mentioned in context of coordination (Likely John Suydam of Apollo).
Kathy Gregory Associate
Mentioned in context of coordination.
Brad New Employee
Described as 'a very nice man' but not full time and needing training.
Joslin Associate
Mentioned as someone whose calls the sender answered.
Carlyn Attorney (implied)
Referenced regarding 'Carlyn's mess' and an 'art partnership'. (Likely Carlyn McCaffrey).

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
JPM Morgan
Mentioned regarding an account 'still not in use'.
House Oversight Committee
Document source (footer).

Timeline (1 events)

Last year
Dire circumstances faced by the recipient.
Unknown
Recipient Sender

Relationships (3)

Jeffrey Epstein Business/Friendship Leon Black
Addressed as 'very close friend', mentions of 'our deal', 'my organizations', and 'Leon's desk'.
Jeffrey Epstein Adversarial Eileen
Epstein complains she provides bad info, ignores instructions, and obfuscates.
Leon Black Professional/Legal Carlyn
Reference to 'Carlyn's mess' and 'Carlyns art partnership'.

Key Quotes (5)

"I was hired to do the architecture, you kept your own team. with Eileen at the head."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg
Quote #1
"If you do the cold calculation ,starting from where you were, to where you are currently . you have made a hell of a deal."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg
Quote #2
"cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg
Quote #3
"you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.), unfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your own design"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg
Quote #4
"The art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,881 characters)

little direction. As a stopgap measure I am suggesting , we put in Larry Delson to take charge Everyone would report to him. Eileen included. He would however work for me. this is not, by a long shot my first choice as I prefer only being responsible and standing behind my own personal work ( ie the word DONE will no longer be transmitted to reflect status stated by others )
With no commitment on my part whatsoever, to do it. So far as I have failed in my attempt in trying to think through the problem creatively . My organizations handling of the more complex issues I believe you might find very costly, very ! ( however many structures available some risk sharing, maybe risk caps ,etc ) but would require my teams doing the work , not yours. Ada should be only a trust, grat administrator. not sure what role you prefer for Eileen as you hired her initially to oversee investments. whether Rich your controller stays or not, is not urgent. having Tom report to a new person,- is. coordination with Suydam Kathy Gregory, I would suggest limiting to one person. The increasing public profile needs to be taken into consideration.
TODAY
With your acquiescence , Eileen did not report to Delson ( he acting as a conduit directly to me) , she continued to provide bad info to both you ( cash flows , stock accts, structures. sales Etc) and me. and each time with my many annoying calls to you made immediately afterwards that she was g.....y !! No one was hired to run YOUR office until two months ago , no one was even interviewed and even now , Brad, a very nice man, is not even full time,(crazy ) Hours upon hours of time need to be spent training him . and his new staff. Eileen followed your instructions. not mine. in fact she continued to ignore mine saying " but Leon said " or " its on Leon's desk etc " , You would become frustrated when i pointed out each instance. of her obfuscation. originally you were given the clear choice, but to save money ,you chose not to hire my team . I was hired to do the architecture, you kept your own team. with Eileen at the head. instructions were given by me, , detailed but ignored by her. ( except in the instances where I inserted myself and personally had to do the weeks of grunt work ),ex. jpm morgan acct still not in use? That being said, If you do the cold calculation ,starting from where you were, to where you are currently . you have made a hell of a deal. -- negotiating down my original amount requested , calling upon our friendship and suggesting that the Carlyn mess was partially my fault. ( though in that specific example , I had never been asked to do more than merely provide you the name of the most highly recognized atty in the field, not consulted,nor even asked again for my guidance along the way. ). I accepted the discount as your friend. ( by the way ,,suggesting now, that your Tom is now that last word on tax characterization, frankly is a bit much,-). however - that is all in the past.
In order to move forward
I would ask that you realize that very unlike yours, My business is only comprised of my personal attention and my personal time . Time that I was forced to grossly overspend on your various issues last year. . As you are my very close friend I will not have you participate in a bidding process that I have decided i will have this year for my time . (hopefully a more fair way to allocate ) I would also ask that you keep in mind that though our deal expired months ago. (also keeping in mind , that your understanding of the final payment terms neither reflected the emails or my memory, we finished it up your way. ) I have answered every call Brad , joslin, Ada or you, have made . reviewed docs over and over/ until once again, I was forced to insert myself strongly as I thought it dangerous not to. I made serious dollar and time concessions last year.very serious I am wiling to continue to accommodate some of your concerns , but I am, under no circumstances , none, willing to spend my time for free. its not fair. After cleaning up Carlyn's mess , which was a few weeks and 30 million dollars . We were both highly aware of the dire circumstances in which you found yourself last year, and in fact due predominately to its seriousness. and those very circumstances I took extra care in our negotiations . (you had claimed I had you over a barrel , ( a horrible position to be in with my very close friend.), unfortunately I fear that if you are not cautious ,in the near future, another barrel will appear of your own design )
I heard you when you said you believed i had already been paid for the work that is now required. The art partnership has fully answered all your concerns and discharged all my obligations and more so. . ( FYI Carlyns art partnership that you referenced is similar in only its title. ) You will also recall that you
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023300

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document