DOJ-OGR-00009356.jpg

405 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 405 KB
Summary

This is page 295 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The witness, Ms. Brune (likely Susan Brune, a defense attorney), is being questioned about a female partner in her law firm regarding ethical obligations and the review of a final brief. Brune confirms reviewing 'email traffic' leading up to the submission of a 'July 21st letter' to ensure material information was conveyed to the Court.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Brune Witness / Lawyer
Testifying under direct examination regarding ethical obligations and document review.
Unidentified Female ('She') Law Firm Partner
Subject of the questioning; a partner in the law firm who made a court appearance and has independent ethical obligat...

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer of the document.
The Court
The entity to whom ethical obligations and material information are owed.
DOJ
Inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00009356.

Timeline (2 events)

February 24, 2022
Filing date of the document containing this transcript.
Court
July 21st
Submission of a letter to the court.
Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by the transcription service name and case number format.

Relationships (1)

Ms. Brune Professional / Supervisory Unidentified Female Partner
Question refers to Brune as the 'ultimate supervisor' of the partner.

Key Quotes (3)

"She has independent ethical obligations, there's no question."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009356.jpg
Quote #1
"She, notwithstanding your role as the ultimate supervisor, cannot evade those ethical obligations by claiming that you're the person in charge"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009356.jpg
Quote #2
"We gathered the email traffic as part of this period leading up to our submitting the July 21st letter."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009356.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,261 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 166-2 Filed 02/24/22 Page 63 of 130
A-5752
295
C2grdau2 Brune - direct
1 Q. She is under the same ethical obligations that you are,
2 correct?
3 A. She is.
4 Q. She is a partner in the law firm, correct?
5 A. That's right.
6 Q. She made an appearance in this court, correct?
7 A. She did.
8 Q. She, notwithstanding your role as the ultimate supervisor,
9 cannot evade those ethical obligations by claiming that you're
10 the person in charge, correct?
11 A. No. She has independent ethical obligations, there's no
12 question.
13 Q. Obligations to bring material information to the Court's
14 attention, correct?
15 A. She has the same ethical obligations as I do or any other
16 lawyer in this court does.
17 Q. Did she review the final brief?
18 A. I'm certain she did.
19 Q. I may have it wrong, so correct me if I am wrong, Ms.
20 Brune -- but let me ask you, on what date did you see the email
21 traffic?
22 A. We gathered the email traffic as part of this period
23 leading up to our submitting the July 21st letter. So I saw I
24 think all of it before we submitted the letter. I was very
25 focused on making sure that I had the information to convey to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00009356

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document