This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 10, 2022) from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330). It records a procedural discussion between defense attorney Ms. Menninger and the Judge regarding the schedule for closing arguments, jury instructions ('charge'), and the commencement of jury deliberations. The Judge outlines a schedule involving government arguments, a lunch break, defense arguments, rebuttal, and the potential start of deliberations that same day.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Discussing trial scheduling and jury deliberations with the Judge. (Likely Laura Menninger, counsel for Ghislaine Max...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, setting the schedule for closing arguments and deliberations.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government | ||
| The Defense | ||
| DOJ |
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by Southern District Reporters
|
|
|
Courthouse where counsel must remain during deliberations
|
"The government will go straight through, we'll then break and I will have the jurors' lunch"Source
"We come back, the defense goes all the way through."Source
"government rebuttal and my charge and begin deliberations if we have time."Source
"I had told the jury to prepare to stay until 6:00"Source
"does your Honor have the practice of counsel being within a certain -- ... -- in the building"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,392 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document