DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
532 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
532 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a legal argument held without the jury present between defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca and prosecutor Ms. Comey regarding the admissibility of a 'state complaint' (Exhibit C4). The defense argues that the complaint should be admitted to show that the defendant, Ms. Maxwell, was not mentioned in it, while the prosecution objects on the grounds that this fact is not inconsistent with the witness's testimony.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Arguing for the admission of a state complaint (Exhibit C4) into evidence.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the legal argument regarding the admissibility of evidence while the jury is not present.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Objecting to the admission of the document, arguing it is not inconsistent with witness testimony.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the inquiry; the defense is highlighting that she was not mentioned in the state complaint being discussed.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating this sidebar occurred during or related to her cross-examination.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, referenced in footer Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding (sidebar/argument without jury) regarding the admissibility of Exhibit C4 (a state complaint).
Courtroom (Southern District of New York)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the court reporter's name and area code (New York).
|
Relationships (2)
Pagliuca is arguing on behalf of the defense strategy concerning Maxwell.
Comey objects to Pagliuca's motion to admit evidence.
Key Quotes (5)
"MR. PAGLIUCA: C4 was the state complaint, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
Quote #1
"MS. COMEY: The objection was that it is not inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
Quote #2
"THE COURT: So just by way of background, you inquired about this document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the complaint; correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
Quote #3
"THE COURT: And the answer to that was no?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
Quote #4
"MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018794.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,308 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 196 of 264 1637
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 (Jury not present)
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, should I sit or stand?
3 THE COURT: I don't mind. I just want to hear you.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: C4 was the state complaint, your Honor.
5 And I'm not sure what the objection was.
6 MS. COMEY: The objection was that it is not
7 inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor. I
8 believe your Honor sustained that objection.
9 THE COURT: That's what I'm hearing you on now.
10 Mr. Pagliuca, you're seeking the admission of the
11 whole document?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: I am, your Honor. Alternatively, the
13 factual paragraphs. This does not have a lot of legalese in
14 it. It didn't seem to be too complicated to me.
15 THE COURT: Okay. So let's pick up the first factual
16 paragraph.
17 So just by way of background, you inquired about this
18 document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the
19 complaint; correct?
20 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
21 THE COURT: And the answer to that was no?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct.
23 THE COURT: So what I think we then need is to take
24 individual statements to determine if there is some
25 inconsistency with the testimony. So point me to the first
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, should I sit or stand?
3 THE COURT: I don't mind. I just want to hear you.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: C4 was the state complaint, your Honor.
5 And I'm not sure what the objection was.
6 MS. COMEY: The objection was that it is not
7 inconsistent with the witness's testimony, your Honor. I
8 believe your Honor sustained that objection.
9 THE COURT: That's what I'm hearing you on now.
10 Mr. Pagliuca, you're seeking the admission of the
11 whole document?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: I am, your Honor. Alternatively, the
13 factual paragraphs. This does not have a lot of legalese in
14 it. It didn't seem to be too complicated to me.
15 THE COURT: Okay. So let's pick up the first factual
16 paragraph.
17 So just by way of background, you inquired about this
18 document and asked if Ms. Maxwell is mentioned anywhere in the
19 complaint; correct?
20 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
21 THE COURT: And the answer to that was no?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: Correct.
23 THE COURT: So what I think we then need is to take
24 individual statements to determine if there is some
25 inconsistency with the testimony. So point me to the first
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018794
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document