This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. The dialogue involves the Judge ('The Court'), prosecutor Mr. Rohrbach, and defense attorney Mr. Everdell discussing the admissibility of Ghislaine Maxwell's 2019 deposition testimony. The specific dispute centers on distinguishing between when Maxwell 'owned' a specific property versus when she began 'living' there (allegedly as early as 1992 or 1993).
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the discussion regarding her residency dates and 2019 deposition.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Government Attorney (Prosecution) |
Responding to the Court's questions regarding government evidence.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing regarding the probative nature of evidence and the definition of a 'mini trial'.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning attorneys about admissibility of deposition testimony.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting service listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Refers to the prosecution team (DOJ).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Unspecified residence where Maxwell allegedly lived beginning in 1992 or 1993.
|
"Maxwell's 2019 deposition indicates that she lived in the home beginning in '92 or '93?"Source
"we're going to have a little mini trial on whether -- on whether Ms. Maxwell lived -- not owned, but lived in that house prior to 1997?"Source
"Your evidence goes to when she owned it. Right?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,341 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document