This document is page 35 of a larger report or book, stamped with a House Oversight Bates number. It contains a geopolitical analysis titled 'Israel and the Great Powers,' discussing Israel's strategic vulnerability to distant imperial powers versus its ability to resist immediate neighbors. It outlines historical precedents (Babylon, Rome, Britain, etc.) and defines three conditions of existence for the state: the 'David model' (independent), the 'Persia model' (subordinate ally/satrapy), and total destruction.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Source of the document production (Bates stamp)
|
|
| Babylon |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
|
| Persia |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
|
| Macedonia |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
|
| Rome |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
|
| Turkey |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
|
| Britain |
Mentioned as a power that controlled Israel
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Primary subject of the geopolitical analysis
|
"The threat to Israel rarely comes from the region, except when the Israelis are divided internally."Source
"Israel can resist its neighbors; danger arises when more distant powers begin playing imperial games."Source
"Israel is constantly entangled with global interests (as the globe is defined at any point), seeking to deflect and align with broader global powers."Source
"We might call this the David model."Source
"We might call this the Persian model in its most beneficent form."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,012 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document