DOJ-OGR-00017941.jpg
578 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
578 KB
Summary
This page is a transcript from the trial United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It details a legal argument between attorney Ms. Pomerantz and the Judge regarding the admissibility of questions related to 'grooming' and 'sexual gratification.' The Judge references a 'Daubert context' (expert witness admissibility) and compares the testimony to a 'pimp-prostitute context.'
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Attorney/Prosecutor |
Arguing regarding the line of questioning about grooming and sexual gratification.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the case, ruling on the admissibility of testimony and interpretation of previous rulings.
|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Name appearing in the header 'Rocchio - Direct'.
|
| Unidentified Female Witness ("She") | Expert Witness (implied) |
Referenced by the Court as 'she's testifying', regarding expert testimony ('Daubert context') on grooming.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court (SDNY) based on the reporter's name.
|
Relationships (1)
Standard courtroom dialogue format (Honor, The Court, Ms. Pomerantz).
Key Quotes (3)
"Your Honor, there is a distinction between the presence of a third party and whose sexual gratification the grooming is for; that that is part and parcel of the larger topic of grooming and attachment."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017941.jpg
Quote #1
"I understand you're saying you didn't intentionally -- the point you're making is you didn't intentionally violate my ruling."Source
DOJ-OGR-00017941.jpg
Quote #2
"I continue to think the testimony regarding whether strategies that she's testifying about can be utilized for the sexual gratification of the person doing the grooming we explored in the Daubert context specifically with me asking whether she talked about -- whether there was literature comparable to the pimp-prostitute context in which grooming"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017941.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,447 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 747 Filed 08/10/22 Page 68 of 228 744
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
LC2VMAX2 Rocchio - Direct
1 And then I believe I had returned to questions about that
2 topic.
3 So I just wanted to note that for your Honor that
4 we -- when I asked that question, I believe that it was
5 different from the question -- the opinion that your Honor had
6 excluded.
7 Your Honor, there is a distinction between the
8 presence of a third party and whose sexual gratification the
9 grooming is for; that that is part and parcel of the larger
10 topic of grooming and attachment.
11 I'm not trying to relitigate it, your Honor --
12 THE COURT: Oh, you're not?
13 MS. POMERANTZ: Well, if your Honor would permit me --
14 THE COURT: Looking at the transcript, I think it's
15 consistent with my ruling. I understand you're saying you
16 didn't intentionally -- the point you're making is you didn't
17 intentionally violate my ruling.
18 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Okay. And I see the portion of the
20 transcript. I continue to think the testimony regarding
21 whether strategies that she's testifying about can be utilized
22 for the sexual gratification of the person doing the grooming
23 we explored in the Daubert context specifically with me asking
24 whether she talked about -- whether there was literature
25 comparable to the pimp-prostitute context in which grooming
2 topic.
3 So I just wanted to note that for your Honor that
4 we -- when I asked that question, I believe that it was
5 different from the question -- the opinion that your Honor had
6 excluded.
7 Your Honor, there is a distinction between the
8 presence of a third party and whose sexual gratification the
9 grooming is for; that that is part and parcel of the larger
10 topic of grooming and attachment.
11 I'm not trying to relitigate it, your Honor --
12 THE COURT: Oh, you're not?
13 MS. POMERANTZ: Well, if your Honor would permit me --
14 THE COURT: Looking at the transcript, I think it's
15 consistent with my ruling. I understand you're saying you
16 didn't intentionally -- the point you're making is you didn't
17 intentionally violate my ruling.
18 MS. POMERANTZ: Yes, your Honor.
19 THE COURT: Okay. And I see the portion of the
20 transcript. I continue to think the testimony regarding
21 whether strategies that she's testifying about can be utilized
22 for the sexual gratification of the person doing the grooming
23 we explored in the Daubert context specifically with me asking
24 whether she talked about -- whether there was literature
25 comparable to the pimp-prostitute context in which grooming
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017941
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document