You need to sign in or sign up before continuing.

HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg

2.25 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Manuscript/book draft (likely ehud barak's memoirs) within house oversight committee production
File Size: 2.25 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from a manuscript or book draft (labeled '/ BARAK / 140') authored by Ehud Barak. It details a sensitive conversation with the US President (implied to be Obama) regarding a potential Israeli military strike ('kinetic action') against Iran's nuclear program. Barak argues that while Israel respects US advice, the ultimate responsibility for Israel's survival rests with himself and Netanyahu ('Bibi'), emphasizing that they cannot delegate this responsibility even to an ally.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator (Implied)
Former Prime Minister/Defense Minister of Israel, speaking in the first person ('I said') about Israeli security stra...
Barack Obama The President (Implied)
Addressed as 'Mr. President', discussing US policy on Iran and 'kinetic action'.
Benjamin Netanyahu Prime Minister of Israel
Referred to as 'Netanyahu' and 'Bibi'. Mentioned as the ultimate authority alongside the narrator.
Iranians Adversary
Target of potential military strike regarding nuclear program.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Mossad
Israeli intelligence agency, mentioned as having members against a military strike.
US Military
Mentioned in context of 'security-speak'.
Israeli Military / Intelligence
Mentioned as having top people respected by leadership.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document production (via footer).

Timeline (1 events)

Unknown
High-level diplomatic meeting between Israeli leadership (Barak) and the US President regarding the Iranian nuclear threat.
Likely Washington D.C. / White House (implied)

Locations (4)

Location Context
Country whose security is being discussed.
Ally of Israel, referred to as 'America'.
Subject of the discussion regarding nuclear capabilities.
Region of interest.

Relationships (2)

Ehud Barak Political Leadership Benjamin Netanyahu
Referenced together as the ultimate decision makers: 'When Bibi and I look up...'
Ehud Barak Diplomatic Counterparts Barack Obama
Direct conversation regarding national security interests.

Key Quotes (5)

"Our problem, Mr, President... is that we can’t be sure our friend will show up."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg
Quote #1
"When they look up, they see Netanyahu, or me. When Bibi and I look up, we see heaven. Whoever is up there, we clearly can’t go to them for advice."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg
Quote #2
"We are responsible for Israel’s security."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg
Quote #3
"But he reiterated his view that 'kinetic action' – US security-speak for a military strike – would not only remove his ability to exhaust the non-military alternatives."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg
Quote #4
"we can’t afford to delegate responsibility even to our best friend and ally."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,582 characters)

/ BARAK / 140
program back by years. And even if the Iranians knew it was coming, they’d be able to do nothing to stop it.
“Our problem, Mr, President,” I said, “is that we can’t be sure our friend will show up. Since Iran is already very nearly in a zone of immunity against an Israeli attack, we can’t afford to wait until the afternoon. By then, with *our capabilities*, we won’t even be able to give the bully a black eye.” I said I trusted what he’d just told me. “I’m sure it genuinely reflects your intentions now. But there are no futures contracts in statesmanship. There’s no way that you, or any leader, can commit yourself to what will happen in a year or two. When the moment of decision arrives, nothing will be able to free you from the responsibility to look at the situation as it is *then*, with *American interests* in mind.”
He accepted the point. But he reiterated his view that “kinetic action” – US security-speak for a military strike – would not only remove his ability to exhaust the non-military alternatives. He said it wouldn’t be in Israel’s interests, either. “We hear that even people high up in your military, in military intelligence and the Mossad, are against it.”
That, I couldn’t deny. “We highly respect our top people in the military, and in intelligence. We make a point of listening to them before taking action,” I said. “But here’s the difference. When they look up, they see Netanyahu, or me. When Bibi and I look up, we see heaven. Whoever is up there, we clearly can’t go to them for advice. *We* are responsible for Israel’s security.”
The president smiled, but brought the discussion back down to earth. When he again urged us to consider the American position in any decision, I replied: “Mr President, I feel compelled to tell you frankly how I see the situation. We highly appreciate, and are grateful, that America supports Israel in so many ways. I believe we’re doing our best to support American interests in the Middle East as well. But when it comes to issues critical for the security and future of Israel, and in a way for the future of the Jewish people, we can’t afford to delegate responsibility even to our best friend and ally. When we face such situations, we have to decide on our own, and act on our decisions. I would expect the United States, and you as its president, to respect that position.” He did not seem especially happy with what I’d said. But he showed no anger. Though we differed, it was clear that he understood and respected our position. In any case, I believed it
426
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011897

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document