This document is a section from a report (likely House Oversight) discussing Chinese influence operations at the state and local government level. It details a specific case study from 2017-2018 where a mid-Atlantic US city formed a sister city partnership with a Chinese town, highlighting how pro-CCP language was inserted into the agreement despite warnings from experts about Beijing's influence tactics. **Note:** While requested as an 'Epstein-related' document, the text strictly concerns US-China relations and local government influence, with no mention of Jeffrey Epstein.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unidentified Woman | Manager of a for-profit Chinese 'exchanges' company |
Of PRC origin; proposed and shepherded the partnership.
|
| Unidentified Man | American citizen of PRC origin running for local school board |
Assisted the manager; objected to the expert's characterization of Beijing's policies.
|
| Unidentified American China Expert | Advisor/Briefer |
Briefed the local sister city committee on Beijing's repressive policies and influence efforts.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Chinese Communist Party (CCP) |
Mentioned as having paramount authority in China's constitution.
|
|
| Chinese People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries |
Required specific language regarding diplomatic principles be included in the agreement.
|
|
| Local Sister City Committee |
Received briefing and debated the agreement.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Home to national security professionals; invited to form sister city relationship.
|
|
|
Proposed partner for the sister city relationship.
|
|
|
Mentioned in diplomatic language.
|
|
|
Mentioned in diplomatic language.
|
|
|
Mentioned as a potential exclusion target under the One China Principle.
|
Complete text extracted from the document (2,338 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document