DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg

487 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 487 KB
Summary

This page contains a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim is examining a witness, Professor/Judge Loftus, establishing that they did not go into great detail about the witness's CV to save time. Sternheim successfully moves to admit the CV (Exhibit EF-1) into evidence over an objection by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. Sternheim then questions Loftus to confirm she is being compensated for her time but has no stake in the trial's outcome.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ms. Sternheim Defense Attorney
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
Loftus Witness
Referred to as 'Judge Loftus' and 'Professor Loftus'. Answering questions regarding CV and compensation.
Ms. Pomerantz Prosecutor (Government)
Objecting to the admission of evidence.
The Court Judge
Ruling on objections ('Overruled').

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
The Government
Prosecution team represented by Ms. Pomerantz.
DOJ
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR bates stamp).

Timeline (1 events)

2022-08-10
Admission of Defendant's Exhibit EF-1 (Judge Loftus's CV) into evidence despite government objection.
Courtroom

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), based on court reporter info.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Sternheim Attorney/Witness Loftus
Sternheim is conducting the direct examination of Loftus.
Ms. Pomerantz Opposing Counsel Ms. Sternheim
Pomerantz objects to Sternheim's motion to admit evidence.

Key Quotes (5)

"Professor Loftus, just to be clear, you are being compensated for your time; correct?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg
Quote #1
"I am, or I hope so, yes."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg
Quote #2
"You don't have any stake in the outcome of this trial, do you?"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg
Quote #3
"The government objects."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg
Quote #4
"Overruled. EF-1 is admitted."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00016638.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,133 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 155 of 246 2450
LCGVMAX5 Loftus - direct
1 BY MS. STERNHEIM:
2 Q. Earlier today I asked you various questions concerning the
3 context of your curriculum vitae, you remember that?
4 A. Yes.
5 Q. Fair to say that we didn't go into great detail about it;
6 correct?
7 A. Well, no, not great detail.
8 Q. And there was much more that you could have told the jury
9 about it, but it would be time-consuming, wouldn't it?
10 A. It would, yes.
11 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, at this time I would move into
12 evidence Judge Loftus's CV, which is EF-1.
13 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: I'm sorry?
15 MS. POMERANTZ: The government objects.
16 THE COURT: Overruled. EF-1 is admitted.
17 MS. STERNHEIM: Thank you.
18 (Defendant's Exhibit EF-1 received in evidence)
19 BY MS. STERNHEIM:
20 Q. Professor Loftus, just to be clear, you are being
21 compensated for your time; correct?
22 A. I am, or I hope so, yes.
23 Q. I hope so, too.
24 You don't have any stake in the outcome of this trial,
25 do you?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016638

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document