This page contains a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Defense attorney Ms. Sternheim is examining a witness, Professor/Judge Loftus, establishing that they did not go into great detail about the witness's CV to save time. Sternheim successfully moves to admit the CV (Exhibit EF-1) into evidence over an objection by prosecutor Ms. Pomerantz. Sternheim then questions Loftus to confirm she is being compensated for her time but has no stake in the trial's outcome.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Conducting direct examination of the witness.
|
| Loftus | Witness |
Referred to as 'Judge Loftus' and 'Professor Loftus'. Answering questions regarding CV and compensation.
|
| Ms. Pomerantz | Prosecutor (Government) |
Objecting to the admission of evidence.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections ('Overruled').
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Prosecution team represented by Ms. Pomerantz.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR bates stamp).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), based on court reporter info.
|
"Professor Loftus, just to be clear, you are being compensated for your time; correct?"Source
"I am, or I hope so, yes."Source
"You don't have any stake in the outcome of this trial, do you?"Source
"The government objects."Source
"Overruled. EF-1 is admitted."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,133 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document