DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
620 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / court document (appeal brief or motion regarding conditions of confinement)
File Size:
620 KB
Summary
This document serves as a legal argument dated April 1, 2021, detailing the harsh prison conditions faced by Ghislaine Maxwell, including sleep deprivation via flashlight checks, inedible food, and undrinkable water. The defense argues that the Bureau of Prisons (BOP) is subjecting her to this unconstitutional treatment solely due to the public relations fallout surrounding the death of Jeffrey Epstein. It further notes that the charges against her stem from allegations made by anonymous accusers regarding events from 1994 to 1997.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Inmate |
Subject of the document; described as suffering poor prison conditions, losing weight/hair, and unable to prepare for...
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Associate |
Mentioned as the reason the BOP is mistreating Maxwell ('because of the death of Epstein').
|
| Anonymous Accusers | Victims/Witnesses |
Three accusers mentioned in the operative indictment regarding actions from 1994-1997.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| BOP |
Bureau of Prisons; accused of subjecting Maxwell to poor treatment due to public relations imperatives.
|
|
| U.S. Justice System |
Mentioned in the context of historical precedent for inmate treatment.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from footer DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (2 events)
1994-1997
Alleged actions related to charges in the operative indictment.
Unspecified
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Where Maxwell is being held; described as having cloudy water and checks every 15 minutes.
|
Relationships (2)
Document claims Maxwell's treatment is a result of Epstein's death and the subsequent fallout.
BOP is holding Maxwell; document accuses BOP of unconstitutional treatment.
Key Quotes (4)
"It is obvious that the BOP is subjecting Ms. Maxwell to this behavior because of the death of Epstein (and subsequent fallout)."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
Quote #1
"Since when are the conditions for one inmate dictated by the fate of another?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
Quote #2
"It is impossible for Ms. Maxwell to participate effectively in the preparation of her defense under these conditions."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
Quote #3
"The charges related to three of the anonymous accusers in the operative indictment are 25 years old, alleging actions from 1994-1997"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000918.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,303 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page8 of 31
flashlight pointed into her cell every 15 minutes. For months, her food
was microwaved with a plastic covering, which rendered it inedible
after the plastic melted into the food.² The water is often cloudy and is
not drinkable. Because of the pandemic, it is not safe to meet with her
lawyers in person, so she cannot adequately prepare for trial. She is on
suicide watch for no reason. She continues to lose weight, her hair, and
her ability to concentrate.
was microwaved with a plastic covering, which rendered it inedible
after the plastic melted into the food.² The water is often cloudy and is
not drinkable. Because of the pandemic, it is not safe to meet with her
lawyers in person, so she cannot adequately prepare for trial. She is on
suicide watch for no reason. She continues to lose weight, her hair, and
her ability to concentrate.
It is obvious that the BOP is subjecting Ms. Maxwell to this
behavior because of the death of Epstein (and subsequent fallout). But
how is this permissible? Since when are the conditions for one inmate
dictated by the fate of another? Perhaps never in the history of the U.S.
Justice System has the public relations imperatives of the government
permitted such wildly inappropriate and unconstitutional treatment of
an innocent human being. It is impossible for Ms. Maxwell to
participate effectively in the preparation of her defense under these
conditions.
behavior because of the death of Epstein (and subsequent fallout). But
how is this permissible? Since when are the conditions for one inmate
dictated by the fate of another? Perhaps never in the history of the U.S.
Justice System has the public relations imperatives of the government
permitted such wildly inappropriate and unconstitutional treatment of
an innocent human being. It is impossible for Ms. Maxwell to
participate effectively in the preparation of her defense under these
conditions.
The charges related to three of the anonymous accusers in the
operative indictment are 25 years old, alleging actions from 1994-1997,
operative indictment are 25 years old, alleging actions from 1994-1997,
________
² The prison has now promised to heat the food properly.
² The prison has now promised to heat the food properly.
6
DOJ-OGR-00000918
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document