DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
536 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
536 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022, involving the cross-examination context of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are factual omissions in the complaint compared to the witness's live testimony, specifically noting that the witness testified to 'penetration and intercourse by Epstein,' which was not included in Paragraph 8 of the complaint. The Judge questions Pagliuca on his theory of inconsistency versus omission and prepares to hear from prosecutor Ms. Comey.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion regarding inconsistencies in testimony.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Arguing that there are factual omissions and inconsistencies in the complaint compared to witness testimony.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Carolyn - cross'; the witness whose testimony is being discussed.
|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the trial; mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Financier / Alleged Abuser |
Accused of penetration and intercourse by the witness.
|
| Kellen | Associate |
Mentioned in relation to Paragraph 9/11A (likely Sarah Kellen).
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Judge states he will hear from her shortly regarding the omission theory.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR footer).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (US v. Maxwell). Discussion concerns cross-examination of witness Carolyn.
Courtroom (Southern District of New York implied)
Relationships (2)
Witness testified she was subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein.
Pagliuca is arguing on behalf of the defense regarding Maxwell.
Key Quotes (4)
"the witness has testified now that she was the subject of penetration and intercourse by Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
Quote #1
"Paragraph 8 does not include that."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
Quote #2
"Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell --"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
Quote #3
"I understand your omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018796.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,319 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 198 of 264 1639
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 things that are in the complaint.
2 THE COURT: So that's a long way of getting to my --
3 responding to my first question.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
5 THE COURT: What paragraph is inconsistent?
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell --
7 THE COURT: Point me to a paragraph.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: All of the paragraphs, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: On the same theory you just pronounced?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
11 THE COURT: So then on your second theory, can you
12 point to any inconsistency?
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, these are all omissions, your
14 Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has
15 testified now that she was the subject of penetration and
16 intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that.
17 Paragraph 9, I think, is an expansion. We have only
18 Kellen, often calling -- excuse me. 11A is what I'm looking
19 at.
20 THE COURT: So other than the omission theory, is
21 there an inconsistency you're pointing to?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: No.
23 THE COURT: Is there any other? I understand your
24 omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second,
25 I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the
2 THE COURT: So that's a long way of getting to my --
3 responding to my first question.
4 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
5 THE COURT: What paragraph is inconsistent?
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, the fact that Ms. Maxwell --
7 THE COURT: Point me to a paragraph.
8 MR. PAGLIUCA: All of the paragraphs, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: On the same theory you just pronounced?
10 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
11 THE COURT: So then on your second theory, can you
12 point to any inconsistency?
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, these are all omissions, your
14 Honor, factual. So paragraph 8, for example, the witness has
15 testified now that she was the subject of penetration and
16 intercourse by Epstein. Paragraph 8 does not include that.
17 Paragraph 9, I think, is an expansion. We have only
18 Kellen, often calling -- excuse me. 11A is what I'm looking
19 at.
20 THE COURT: So other than the omission theory, is
21 there an inconsistency you're pointing to?
22 MR. PAGLIUCA: No.
23 THE COURT: Is there any other? I understand your
24 omission theory, I'll hear from Ms. Comey on that in a second,
25 I do have a question for you on it, and I need to read the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018796
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document