This document is page 208 of a court transcript (Document 767) filed on August 10, 2022, from the trial of Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It contains jury instructions regarding the legal definition of 'interstate commerce' in the context of sex trafficking, clarifying that actual travel is not required if the acts were economic in nature. It also introduces Instruction No. 30 regarding 'Aiding and abetting' for Counts Two, Four, and Six.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referenced as 'Ms. Maxwell' in line 3 regarding the government's burden of proof concerning intent and interstate com...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer as the reporting agency.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced in line 2 regarding the necessity of proof.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
"It's not necessary for the government to prove that Ms. Maxwell specifically knew or intended that her conduct would affect interstate commerce"Source
"Proof of actual travel is not required."Source
"If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the recruitment, enticement, harboring, transportation, providing, or obtaining of a person for the purpose of engaging in commercial sex acts was economic in nature... you may find that the interstate commerce requirement... has been satisfied."Source
"Instruction No. 30. Counts Two, Four, and Six. Aiding and abetting."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,578 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document