DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
623 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
623 KB
Summary
A page from a court transcript filed on February 10, 2020, regarding Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT. Defense attorney Mr. Foy is arguing for an adjournment of proceedings, citing the need for further investigation and a scheduling conflict with another trial set to begin July 20 before Judge Ramos at 40 Foley Square. Foy notes that the other trial involves a client facing a mandatory life sentence who has been incarcerated for nearly two years.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Foy | Defense Counsel |
Speaker arguing for an adjournment due to investigation needs and scheduling conflicts.
|
| Judge Ramos | Judge |
Presiding over a separate trial involving Mr. Foy scheduled for July.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge in the current hearing, asks for the date at the end of the page.
|
| Unnamed Client | Defendant (Other Case) |
Client of Mr. Foy in the Judge Ramos case; incarcerated for almost two years and facing a mandatory life sentence.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Opposed the length of the requested adjournment.
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Source of the document release (footer).
|
Timeline (2 events)
July 20 (Year implied 2020)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the courthouse where Judge Ramos sits.
|
Relationships (2)
my client's been incarcerated for almost two years
I was scheduled to start a trial before Judge Ramos
Key Quotes (3)
"The defense is in the best position to assess how much time we need to perform our important function on behalf of our clients."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
Quote #1
"We are not making a request for the purpose of simply delaying the proceedings."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
Quote #2
"He is facing a mandatory life sentence."Source
DOJ-OGR-00022006.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,611 characters)
Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT Document 26 Filed 02/10/20 Page 3 of 15 3
klu2NoeC kjc
klu2NoeC kjc
1 own investigation, which can't really fully get started until
2 we appreciate what information has already been provided.
3 That's really the crux of the reason.
4 Now, I noted in the government's opposition, although
5 they agree that some adjournment is warranted, I guess the
6 issue is of how long the adjournment should be. The defense is
7 in the best position to assess how much time we need to perform
8 our important function on behalf of our clients. I say that
9 because we are not making a request for the purpose of simply
10 delaying the proceedings. We are doing it because it is
11 actually necessary to accomplish our goals as counsel.
12 Also, which I did not reference in my letter, is it
13 also takes into account my trial schedule, at least why my
14 request was. Last week, I was scheduled to start a trial
15 before Judge Ramos in 40 Foley Square in July. And part of
16 what I discussed with Judge Ramos in setting that trial date
17 was that I knew that this trial may need to be accommodated in
18 some way. He selected July 20 for that date mostly because of
19 the court's availability at that time. That's also part of the
20 reason. And in that particular case, my client's been
21 incarcerated for almost two years. He is facing a mandatory
22 life sentence. So I do need to spend some of my time getting
23 ready for that as well, and I expect that to be our trial date.
24 THE COURT: What's the date?
25 MR. FOY: What's the date?
2 we appreciate what information has already been provided.
3 That's really the crux of the reason.
4 Now, I noted in the government's opposition, although
5 they agree that some adjournment is warranted, I guess the
6 issue is of how long the adjournment should be. The defense is
7 in the best position to assess how much time we need to perform
8 our important function on behalf of our clients. I say that
9 because we are not making a request for the purpose of simply
10 delaying the proceedings. We are doing it because it is
11 actually necessary to accomplish our goals as counsel.
12 Also, which I did not reference in my letter, is it
13 also takes into account my trial schedule, at least why my
14 request was. Last week, I was scheduled to start a trial
15 before Judge Ramos in 40 Foley Square in July. And part of
16 what I discussed with Judge Ramos in setting that trial date
17 was that I knew that this trial may need to be accommodated in
18 some way. He selected July 20 for that date mostly because of
19 the court's availability at that time. That's also part of the
20 reason. And in that particular case, my client's been
21 incarcerated for almost two years. He is facing a mandatory
22 life sentence. So I do need to spend some of my time getting
23 ready for that as well, and I expect that to be our trial date.
24 THE COURT: What's the date?
25 MR. FOY: What's the date?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00022006
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document