DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
566 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
566 KB
Summary
This document is a page from the court transcript of Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell), dated August 10, 2022. Prosecutor Ms. Moe discusses the admissibility of two photographs (Government Exhibits 309 and 332); Exhibit 309 depicts a witness named Kate who testified earlier, while Exhibit 332 depicts a non-testifying victim. The discussion clarifies that a previously admitted version of Exhibit 332 was cropped to show only the face, and the government is now seeking to discuss the full photograph.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government Attorney) |
Arguing for the admission of photographic evidence (Exhibits 309 and 332).
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the evidentiary discussion.
|
| Meder | Witness |
Mentioned in the header 'Meder - direct', indicating the current witness on the stand during this session.
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim |
Testified earlier in the day; depicted in Government Exhibit 309.
|
| Unnamed Individual (Exhibit 332) | Victim (Alleged) |
Described as a victim in the case who is not testifying; depicted in Government Exhibit 332.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution team presenting the case.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY), inferred from the court reporter's name and case context.
|
Relationships (2)
309 depicts the witness who testified earlier today as Kate.
Unnamed Victim (Exhibit 332)
→
Subject of
→
Government Exhibit 332
Exhibit 332 depicts someone the government contends is a victim.
Key Quotes (4)
"309 depicts the witness who testified earlier today as Kate. The jury has met her."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
Quote #1
"the second is someone who will -- the government will contend is a victim in this case, though not testifying, number 332."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
Quote #2
"With respect to Government Exhibit 332, a cropped version of that photograph which shows only that individual's face has already been offered in evidence"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
Quote #3
"The photograph that we used for identification purposes was a cropped photograph of just the face. The full photograph is a"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018588.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,395 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 251 of 261 1412
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
LC6Cmax7 Meder - direct
1 to is 309, and the second is someone who will -- the government
2 will contend is a victim in this case, though not testifying,
3 number 332.
4 THE COURT: 309.
5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 309 depicts the witness
6 who testified earlier today as Kate. The jury has met her.
7 This is a photograph of that same person.
8 Again, to the extent the defense has the native file,
9 which we produced in discovery, to the extent they wish to make
10 any arguments about timeframes or metadata, they're free to do
11 so, but a photograph of this person is certainly relevant given
12 the context.
13 With respect to Government Exhibit 332, your Honor, if
14 I could just have one moment.
15 THE COURT: Okay.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. I just wanted to
17 confirm. With respect to Government Exhibit 332, a cropped
18 version of that photograph which shows only that individual's
19 face has already been offered in evidence and identified by
20 another witness as that individual.
21 THE COURT: So what's the relevance of a duplicate
22 photo?
23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not a duplicate photograph.
24 The photograph that we used for identification purposes was a
25 cropped photograph of just the face. The full photograph is a
2 will contend is a victim in this case, though not testifying,
3 number 332.
4 THE COURT: 309.
5 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. 309 depicts the witness
6 who testified earlier today as Kate. The jury has met her.
7 This is a photograph of that same person.
8 Again, to the extent the defense has the native file,
9 which we produced in discovery, to the extent they wish to make
10 any arguments about timeframes or metadata, they're free to do
11 so, but a photograph of this person is certainly relevant given
12 the context.
13 With respect to Government Exhibit 332, your Honor, if
14 I could just have one moment.
15 THE COURT: Okay.
16 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor. I just wanted to
17 confirm. With respect to Government Exhibit 332, a cropped
18 version of that photograph which shows only that individual's
19 face has already been offered in evidence and identified by
20 another witness as that individual.
21 THE COURT: So what's the relevance of a duplicate
22 photo?
23 MS. MOE: Your Honor, it's not a duplicate photograph.
24 The photograph that we used for identification purposes was a
25 cropped photograph of just the face. The full photograph is a
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018588
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018588
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document