DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
603 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
603 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. Defense attorney Mr. Everdell argues against the admissibility or weight of photographs taken during a 2005 walk-through of an Epstein residence, noting that witness Juan Alessi left in 2002 and witness 'Jane' only gave general descriptions of art, not specific identifications of the photos in question. The defense contends there is no testimony placing specific photos on the wall during the time relevant to the case.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Arguing against the relevance of 2005 photographs to the period relevant to the case.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, mentions testimony of 'Jane'.
|
| Juan Alessi | Witness/Former Employee |
Testified regarding the property, but left employment in 2002.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Associated Figure |
Mentioned in the phrase 'people in Epstein's orbit'.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Referred to as 'Ms. Maxwell'; defense argues about what she would have known.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Gave testimony regarding art and photographs in the residences.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information
|
|
| The Government |
Making arguments regarding the photographs and witnesses.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2002
2005
A 'walk-through' was conducted and photographs were taken of the residence.
Epstein Residence
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Subject of the walk-through, photographs, and witness recollections regarding art on the walls.
|
Relationships (3)
Implied by testimony about leaving in 2002.
Described as being in 'Epstein's orbit'.
Everdell is arguing on behalf of the defense regarding evidence potentially harmful to Maxwell.
Key Quotes (5)
"Juan Alessi has sort of testified about this, but he left in 2002 according to his own testimony."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
Quote #1
"This walk-through and these photographs were taken in 2005, which are three years later."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
Quote #2
"the people in Epstein's orbit would have known about this, including Ms. Maxwell"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
Quote #3
"We have testimony of Jane regarding art and photographs."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
Quote #4
"She gave very, very general descriptions of her recollection of certain residences, not particular artworks, not particular photographs."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018111.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,519 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 10 of 236 914
LBUCmax1
LBUCmax1
1 overrule the objection with a limiting instruction.
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I understand the Court's
3 ruling. If I can make one other point, which is the fact that
4 Juan Alessi has sort of testified about this, but he left in
5 2002 according to his own testimony. This walk-through and
6 these photographs were taken in 2005, which are three years
7 later. So the government is -- he didn't say that that photo
8 was there.
9 So I mean the government is making the argument that
10 these important people may have seen these photographs or the
11 fact the photograph was there contradicts the defense argument
12 that the people in Epstein's orbit would have known about this,
13 including Ms. Maxwell, but we actually don't have any testimony
14 that the photo was on the wall at the time that's relevant to
15 this case.
16 THE COURT: We have testimony of Jane regarding art
17 and photographs.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Not this photo, your Honor. They
19 didn't go through with Jane specific photographs, do you recall
20 this one, do you recall that one, was that on the wall, was
21 this on the wall. She gave very, very general descriptions of
22 her recollection of certain residences, not particular
23 artworks, not particular photographs.
24 So I don't think it's fair, on the record we have, to
25 say that this photograph being on the wall in 2005 - mind you,
2 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I understand the Court's
3 ruling. If I can make one other point, which is the fact that
4 Juan Alessi has sort of testified about this, but he left in
5 2002 according to his own testimony. This walk-through and
6 these photographs were taken in 2005, which are three years
7 later. So the government is -- he didn't say that that photo
8 was there.
9 So I mean the government is making the argument that
10 these important people may have seen these photographs or the
11 fact the photograph was there contradicts the defense argument
12 that the people in Epstein's orbit would have known about this,
13 including Ms. Maxwell, but we actually don't have any testimony
14 that the photo was on the wall at the time that's relevant to
15 this case.
16 THE COURT: We have testimony of Jane regarding art
17 and photographs.
18 MR. EVERDELL: Not this photo, your Honor. They
19 didn't go through with Jane specific photographs, do you recall
20 this one, do you recall that one, was that on the wall, was
21 this on the wall. She gave very, very general descriptions of
22 her recollection of certain residences, not particular
23 artworks, not particular photographs.
24 So I don't think it's fair, on the record we have, to
25 say that this photograph being on the wall in 2005 - mind you,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018111
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018111
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document