DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
581 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / appellate brief
File Size:
581 KB
Summary
This document is page 13 of a legal brief filed on April 1, 2021, related to Ghislaine Maxwell's appeal regarding bail denial. It argues that the trial judge denied bail without reviewing actual evidence and highlights Maxwell's 'Kafkaesque' detention conditions. It also summarizes 12 pretrial motions filed by the defense, including arguments regarding the statute of limitations and the violation of Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant/Appellant |
Subject of the legal filing, appealing a denial of bail and citing pretrial motions.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased/Co-conspirator |
Mentioned in relation to a non-prosecution agreement that allegedly protected co-conspirators.
|
| Unidentified Judge | Trial Court Judge |
Denied Maxwell's motion for bail.
|
| Unidentified Former Federal Judge | Proposed Monitor |
Proposed to control and monitor assets.
|
| Unidentified Former U.S. Attorney | Proposed Monitor |
Proposed to control and monitor assets.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution opposing the bail and responding to motions.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR).
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021-04-01
Prior to 2021-04-01
Relationships (1)
Document mentions motion to dismiss based on Epstein's non-prosecution agreement protecting 'any alleged co-conspirator'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Without prejudicing the merits of any of those pending motions"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
Quote #1
"proffered strength and nature of the Government’s case"Source
DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
Quote #2
"Ms. Maxwell has documented the Kafkaesque conditions that she is forced to endure."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
Quote #3
"dismiss because the government violated the non-prosecution agreement it reached with Epstein that protected any alleged co-conspirator from prosecution."Source
DOJ-OGR-00000923.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,194 characters)
Case 21-770, Document 20-1, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page13 of 31
assets controlled and monitored by a former federal judge and former U.S. Attorney. She also cited the 12 pretrial motions she filed.
“Without prejudicing the merits of any of those pending motions,” the judge again denied Ms. Maxwell’s motion for bail, relying in part on the “proffered strength and nature of the Government’s case,” even though, again, no evidence was actually submitted to or reviewed by the trial court. This appeal follows.
“Without prejudicing the merits of any of those pending motions,” the judge again denied Ms. Maxwell’s motion for bail, relying in part on the “proffered strength and nature of the Government’s case,” even though, again, no evidence was actually submitted to or reviewed by the trial court. This appeal follows.
In each of her bail requests and in separate pleadings, Ms. Maxwell has documented the Kafkaesque conditions that she is forced to endure. See, e.g., Ex.M.
B. The pretrial motions
Ms. Maxwell filed 12 substantial pretrial motions. Docs. 119-26; 133-48. These include motions to dismiss for violation of the statute of limitations (Docs. 143-44) and for pre-indictment delay (Docs. 137-38) because the conduct is so old. And to dismiss because the government violated the non-prosecution agreement it reached with Epstein that protected any alleged co-conspirator from prosecution. Docs 141-42. The government needed 212 pages to respond to these motions. These
11
DOJ-OGR-00000923
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document