EFTA00014540.pdf
97.8 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
97.8 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from July 2019 between an attorney representing victims (Jane Doe 1 and 2) and likely prosecutors or investigators. The discussion centers on the legal argument that the Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not extend to New York, a key point in the prosecution of Epstein. The attorney updates the recipients on recent filings in the Florida CVRA case, specifically mentioning motions by Epstein's lawyer, Marty Weinberg, and coordinates a phone call to discuss Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) expertise.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Marty Weinberg | Epstein's Lawyer |
Filed a motion for a sur-reply discussing the scope of the NPA.
|
| Judge Marra | Judge |
Presiding over the Florida CVRA case; asked for a quick response to Weinberg's motion.
|
| Jane Doe 1 and 2 | Victims/Clients |
Clients of the email sender; filed a brief in the Florida CVRA case.
|
| Sender (Redacted) | Attorney for Jane Does |
Admitted to Utah State Bar; communicating with investigators about the NPA scope.
|
| Recipient (Redacted) | Investigator/Prosecutor |
Interested in CVRA expertise; monitoring the docket for relevant submissions.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Utah State Bar |
Sender is admitted to this bar.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-07-23
Filing by Jane Doe 1 and 2 in the Florida CVRA case regarding remedies.
Florida
2019-07-24
Relationships (2)
Referred to as 'Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg)'
Signed as 'for Jane Doe 1 and 2'
Key Quotes (4)
"My clients were told back in 2013 that the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions - and that is the point we are making to Judge Marra."Source
EFTA00014540.pdf
Quote #1
"Judge Marra must craft remedies in the case that relate solely to Florida crimes and Florida victims ... because the NPA only covers Florida."Source
EFTA00014540.pdf
Quote #2
"But yesterday Epstein's lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply."Source
EFTA00014540.pdf
Quote #3
"We wanted to talk with you about a question in connection with your expertise on the CVRA generally."Source
EFTA00014540.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,846 characters)
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:25:20 +0000
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2019 02:25:20 +0000
Will do.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:24
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:24
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Perfect - call my cell - [Redacted]
[Redacted] - sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and errors.
On Jul 25, 2019, at 8:21 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much. Would 10:00 a.m. tomorrow your time (noon our time) work? If so, we can call you then at [Redacted], or if not, we could also do 2:00 p.m. your time.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:13
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 22:13
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Happy to chat tomorrow. Name your time that’s convenient for you.
[Redacted] - sent from my iPhone - please excuse brevity and errors.
On Jul 25, 2019, at 8:07 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
[Redacted],
Thank you for sending us these materials, we appreciate being able to stay up to date, and we’ll continue to keep an eye on the docket for submissions that may be relevant for our investigation.
Separately, might you be available for a quick call sometime tomorrow (Friday) or next week? No rush or emergency, but we wanted to talk with you about a question in connection with your expertise on the CVRA generally. At your convenience.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00014540
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 13:01
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2019 13:01
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Briefing in Florida regarding whether the Florida NPA extends to New York
Hi [Redacted],
I wanted to make you aware of a recent filing (on Tuesday) by Jane Doe 1 and 2 in the Florida CVRA case. See attached. You may find interesting our argument at pp. 3-6, in which we explain why Judge Marra must craft remedies in the case that relate solely to Florida crimes and Florida victims ... because the NPA only covers Florida.
We filed our reply brief on remedies on Tuesday – and that should have brought all briefing on remedies for the CVRA violation to a close. But yesterday Epstein’s lawyer (Marty Weinberg) filed a motion for a sur-reply. See attached. In point (a) on page 2, he argues that he should have an opportunity to file a sur-reply discussing, among other things, the scope of the NPA. On Monday, we will be filing an opposition to Weinberg extending the briefing further. It appears that Judge Marra is poised to rule rapidly on the motion for a sur-reply, as he asked for us to respond quickly.
I wanted to make you aware of these developments. My clients were told back in 2013 that the NPA did not extend to New York or other jurisdictions – and that is the point we are making to Judge Marra.
[Redacted] for Jane Doe 1 and 2
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted] (phone) [Redacted] (fax)
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted] (phone) [Redacted] (fax)
You can access my publications on [Redacted]
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. [Redacted] is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own.
EFTA00014541
CONFIDENTIAL: This electronic message - along with any/all attachments - is confidential. This message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, you may not use, disseminate, distribute or copy this communication. If you have received this message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply electronic mail and delete the original message. [Redacted] is admitted to the Utah State Bar, but not the bars of other states. Any views he expresses in this email are his own.
EFTA00014541
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document