This is page 3 of a legal filing (Document 28) dated July 27, 2020, addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The text argues for a specific provision in a protective order regarding victim/witness identities. Maxwell's defense contends that they should be permitted to reference alleged victims who have already voluntarily disclosed their identities in public records or media, arguing that the government's proposed restrictions are overly broad and hinder the defense's ability to investigate and advocate.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Addressee of the letter/filing.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal case and the proposed protective order.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased / Co-conspirator |
Referenced regarding previous criminal prosecution and litigation.
|
| Defense Counsel | Attorneys |
Lawyers representing Maxwell, arguing for specific terms in the protective order.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Prosecution/DOJ opposing the defense's proposed language.
|
|
| S.D.N.Y. |
Southern District of New York (Court jurisdiction).
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by footer DOJ-OGR).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction cited for the United States v. Epstein case.
|
"Ms. Maxwell’s proposed protective order... does not prohibit defense counsel from publicly referencing individuals 'who have spoken on the public record to the media or in public fora...'"Source
"The government’s proposed restriction is therefore 'broader than necessary' to protect the privacy interests of these individuals who have already chosen to self-identify"Source
"this language... is nearly identical in all material respects to the language in the protective order approved in the government’s criminal prosecution of Mr. Epstein"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,237 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document