DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
700 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
5
Organizations
3
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal correspondence / court filing
File Size:
700 KB
Summary
This document is a letter from the U.S. Attorney to Judge Alison J. Nathan providing an update on Ghislaine Maxwell's confinement conditions at the MDC. The Government asserts that Maxwell receives exceptional access to discovery materials (13 hours/day, 7 days/week) via both a laptop and desktop. A footnote addresses complaints regarding missing emails, stating that an investigation revealed Maxwell deleted or archived them herself, with no evidence of MDC staff misconduct.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Recipient of the letter; United States District Court Judge.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the letter regarding conditions of confinement.
|
| MDC Legal Counsel | Source |
Provided information to the Government regarding confinement conditions.
|
| Defense Counsel | Attorney |
Mentioned in footnote regarding complaints about deleted emails.
|
Organizations (5)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Department of Justice |
Letterhead authority.
|
|
| United States Attorney Southern District of New York |
Sender of the letter.
|
|
| United States District Court Southern District of New York |
Recipient institution.
|
|
| Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) |
Location where Ghislaine Maxwell is confined.
|
|
| BOP (Bureau of Prisons) |
Mentioned regarding email purging policy.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Prior to 2021-04-06
MDC staff examined defendant's email account following complaints of deletion.
Metropolitan Detention Center
MDC Staff
Ghislaine Maxwell
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Sender's address.
|
|
|
Recipient's address.
|
|
|
Place of confinement.
|
Relationships (2)
Case caption: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
Judge presiding over defendant's case
Key Quotes (4)
"The defendant continues to receive more time to review discovery than any other inmate at the MDC."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
Quote #1
"Specifically, the defendant is permitted to review her discovery thirteen hours per day, seven days per week."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
Quote #2
"That examination revealed that the defendant had herself deleted some of her emails and had archived others."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
Quote #3
"That examination revealed no evidence to suggest that MDC staff deleted any of the defendant’s emails."Source
DOJ-OGR-00001359.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,966 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 292 Filed 04/06/21 Page 1 of 6
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
U.S. Department of Justice
United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
The Silvio J. Mollo Building
One Saint Andrew's Plaza
New York, New York 10007
April 6, 2021
BY ECF
The Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, New York 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell, 20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government respectfully submits this letter to provide an update regarding the
defendant’s conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) pursuant to
the Court’s Order dated December 8, 2020. (Dkt. No. 92). This update is based on information
provided to the Government by MDC legal counsel regarding the conditions of the defendant’s
confinement over the last two months.
defendant’s conditions of confinement at the Metropolitan Detention Center (“MDC”) pursuant to
the Court’s Order dated December 8, 2020. (Dkt. No. 92). This update is based on information
provided to the Government by MDC legal counsel regarding the conditions of the defendant’s
confinement over the last two months.
The defendant continues to receive more time to review discovery than any other inmate
at the MDC. Specifically, the defendant is permitted to review her discovery thirteen hours per
day, seven days per week. During the entirety of that time, the defendant has access to both a
desktop computer provided by the MDC and a laptop computer provided by the Government on
which to review discovery. Also during those thirteen hours per day, the defendant may use the
MDC desktop computer to send and receive emails with her attorneys.¹ This discovery review
at the MDC. Specifically, the defendant is permitted to review her discovery thirteen hours per
day, seven days per week. During the entirety of that time, the defendant has access to both a
desktop computer provided by the MDC and a laptop computer provided by the Government on
which to review discovery. Also during those thirteen hours per day, the defendant may use the
MDC desktop computer to send and receive emails with her attorneys.¹ This discovery review
________________________________________________________________
¹ Per BOP policy, all inmate emails are routinely purged every six months. In response to
complaints from the defendant and defense counsel regarding prematurely deleted emails, MDC
staff examined the defendant’s inmate email account. That examination revealed that the
defendant had herself deleted some of her emails and had archived others. That examination
revealed no evidence to suggest that MDC staff deleted any of the defendant’s emails.
¹ Per BOP policy, all inmate emails are routinely purged every six months. In response to
complaints from the defendant and defense counsel regarding prematurely deleted emails, MDC
staff examined the defendant’s inmate email account. That examination revealed that the
defendant had herself deleted some of her emails and had archived others. That examination
revealed no evidence to suggest that MDC staff deleted any of the defendant’s emails.
DOJ-OGR-00001359
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document