This is page 58 of a court transcript from July 24, 2019, in the case of United States v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB). The page captures a debate between the Judge (The Court) and defense attorney Mr. Weinberg regarding the fairness of bail conditions and access to counsel. Weinberg argues that the unique complexity of the case (facing a well-resourced prosecution and 'a million pages of discovery') justifies different treatment than typical defendants at Rikers Island, while the Court counters by highlighting the serious nature of crimes faced by indigent defendants.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Weinberg | Defense Attorney |
Arguing on behalf of the defendant (Jeffrey Epstein), distinguishing his case from typical defendants based on the re...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing (Case 1:19-cr-00490-RMB indicates Judge Richard M. Berman); questioning the fairness of sp...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| Rikers Island |
Referenced as a location where typical defendants are held.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, indicated by the Bates stamp DOJ-OGR.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the location where other defendants are held.
|
"But if that's the standard, then what are we going to tell all those people who can't make a $500 or $1,000 bail who say, I want to talk to my lawyer..."Source
"The first is that the defendants in Rikers Island, or at least the vast majority of them, are not facing a prosecution team as well resourced and as talented as this one."Source
"They're not facing a million pages of discovery."Source
"They might be facing a lot more serious consequences in terms of jail or incarceration for let's say assault or murder or rape or whatever..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,519 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document