DOJ-OGR-00018162.jpg
392 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
392 KB
Summary
This document is page 61 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (the Ghislaine Maxwell trial), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument during the cross-examination of a witness named Alessi. Ms. Comey objects to the defense using a prior declaration, arguing it isn't inconsistent, but the Court overrules the objection, allowing Mr. Pagliuca to question the witness about the discrepancy between 'multiple occasions' (testimony) and 'one' (declaration).
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alessi | Witness |
Subject of cross-examination (mentioned in header 'Alessi - Cross')
|
| Ms. Comey | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Arguing against the admission of a prior declaration, stating it is not inconsistent.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (Defense) |
Thanking the court after a ruling in his favor.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on an objection regarding witness testimony and prior declarations.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in footer
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (implied by DOJ-OGR stamp)
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Alessi in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). Legal argument regarding impeachment with a prior declaration.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by court reporter location and case context
|
Relationships (2)
Arguing opposite sides of an evidentiary objection.
Header indicates 'Alessi - Cross' and Pagliuca is the attorney receiving permission to ask questions.
Key Quotes (3)
"I just don't see the basis to put this in front of the jury if it's not inconsistent on its face."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018162.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, on this one, I think he said multiple occasions, this says one. He can explain the difference, and the jury will decide."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018162.jpg
Quote #2
"So I'll permit you to ask about that one."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018162.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (812 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 749 Filed 08/10/22 Page 61 of 236 965
LC3KMAX2 Alessi - Cross
LC3KMAX2 Alessi - Cross
1 remembers one occasion does not preclude that there were other
2 occasions. He's just saying in the declaration --
3 THE COURT: I agree, and I presume that will be the
4 testimony.
5 MS. COMEY: But then, your Honor, it's not
6 inconsistent. I just don't see the basis to put this in front
7 of the jury if it's not inconsistent on its face. There's just
8 not a basis.
9 THE COURT: Well, on this one, I think he said
10 multiple occasions, this says one. He can explain the
11 difference, and the jury will decide.
12 So I'll permit you to ask about that one.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.
14 (Continued on next page)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
2 occasions. He's just saying in the declaration --
3 THE COURT: I agree, and I presume that will be the
4 testimony.
5 MS. COMEY: But then, your Honor, it's not
6 inconsistent. I just don't see the basis to put this in front
7 of the jury if it's not inconsistent on its face. There's just
8 not a basis.
9 THE COURT: Well, on this one, I think he said
10 multiple occasions, this says one. He can explain the
11 difference, and the jury will decide.
12 So I'll permit you to ask about that one.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: Thank you.
14 (Continued on next page)
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018162
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018162
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document