DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
577 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
577 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell trial) filed on August 10, 2022. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the judge that he should be permitted to cross-examine a witness named Carolyn about her extensive psychiatric history and ongoing drug abuse, claiming she minimized these issues during direct examination. He specifically mentions her history of schizophrenia and having her children removed from her custody.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney (likely Defense) |
Arguing to the court to expand the scope of cross-examination regarding a witness's psychiatric and drug history.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Present in court, defers her issue to 'the back of the bus'.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
The witness under cross-examination (referenced in header); subject of the discussion regarding psychiatric issues, d...
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion.
|
| Carolyn's Mother | Relative |
Mentioned as having custody of the witness's children.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer code DOJ-OGR-00018760)
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Legal argument regarding the scope of cross-examination for witness Carolyn.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and case number format.
|
Relationships (2)
Witness has a significant history of having her children taken away from her.
Pagliuca seeking to impeach witness credibility regarding drug abuse and psychiatric history.
Key Quotes (3)
"I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about her extensive psychiatric history."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
Quote #1
"There were questions on direct examination about her ongoing drug abuse, and I think that opens -- and I think it was minimized."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
Quote #2
"This witness has a significant history of having her children taken away from her and these children living with her mother or other relatives."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018760.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,453 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 162 of 264 1588
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX5 Carolyn - cross
1 talk about it now.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. I don't know if you want to deal
3 with Ms. Sternheim's issue first.
4 MS. STERNHEIM: Mine should go to the back of the bus
5 on this.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So there was direct examination
8 testimony, your Honor, concerning psychiatric issues, ongoing
9 psychiatric issues, with this witness. I think there was some
10 minimization of the ongoing psychiatric issues. And the
11 records that I have reflect much more extensive psychiatric
12 issues.
13 I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about
14 her extensive psychiatric history. There were questions on
15 direct examination about her ongoing drug abuse, and I think
16 that opens -- and I think it was minimized. And I think that
17 that opens the door to my being able to examine on the full
18 extent of her ongoing drug abuse.
19 There was also testimony raised sort of in the vein
20 of, I'm schizophrenic and I am schizophrenic about my children
21 because they're important to me, essentially, and that's why I
22 have this schizophrenia and hear voices around my children.
23 This witness has a significant history of having her
24 children taken away from her and these children living with her
25 mother or other relatives. And I think that the way that the
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. I don't know if you want to deal
3 with Ms. Sternheim's issue first.
4 MS. STERNHEIM: Mine should go to the back of the bus
5 on this.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So there was direct examination
8 testimony, your Honor, concerning psychiatric issues, ongoing
9 psychiatric issues, with this witness. I think there was some
10 minimization of the ongoing psychiatric issues. And the
11 records that I have reflect much more extensive psychiatric
12 issues.
13 I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about
14 her extensive psychiatric history. There were questions on
15 direct examination about her ongoing drug abuse, and I think
16 that opens -- and I think it was minimized. And I think that
17 that opens the door to my being able to examine on the full
18 extent of her ongoing drug abuse.
19 There was also testimony raised sort of in the vein
20 of, I'm schizophrenic and I am schizophrenic about my children
21 because they're important to me, essentially, and that's why I
22 have this schizophrenia and hear voices around my children.
23 This witness has a significant history of having her
24 children taken away from her and these children living with her
25 mother or other relatives. And I think that the way that the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018760
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document