DOJ-OGR-00010075.jpg

400 KB

Extraction Summary

6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Transcript of legal proceeding (deposition or testimony)
File Size: 400 KB
Summary

This document is a partial transcript from a legal proceeding, likely a deposition or testimony, involving a person named Edelstein. The questions revolve around Edelstein's involvement in the trial for the defense of David Parse, email exchanges mentioning Robert Conrad, Theresa Trzaskoma, and David Benhamou, and the receipt of a 'dossier' or a link to one, possibly related to a Catherine Conrad letter.

People (6)

Name Role Context
Edelstein Witness/Deponent
Answering questions in a legal proceeding
Robert Conrad Mentioned individual
Identified as the father in email exchanges
Theresa Trzaskoma Mentioned individual
Participant in email exchanges
David Benhamou Mentioned individual
Participant in email exchanges
David Parse Defendant
Trial subject, Edelstein's principal duty involved his defense
Catherine Conrad Mentioned individual
Author of a letter referenced in a question

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
Reporting agency for the legal proceeding

Timeline (2 events)

Trial related to the defense of David Parse, where Edelstein was involved in various parts, focusing on opening/closing statements, expert testimony, and witnesses.
Meetings where jurors were discussed prior to voir dire.
Edelstein jurors (discussed)

Relationships (3)

Edelstein legal defense involvement David Parse
Edelstein's role in the trial was in connection with the defense of David Parse.
Theresa Trzaskoma communicated via email David Benhamou
Both were on email exchanges.
Robert Conrad familial (father-daughter implied) Catherine Conrad
Robert Conrad identified as 'the father' and Catherine Conrad wrote a letter, suggesting a familial link, possibly father-daughter.

Key Quotes (3)

"I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved in various parts of it. I focused on the opening and the closing statements, the expert testimony, several of the witnesses."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010075.jpg
Quote #1
"Well, I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors were discussed prior to voir dire and then my role really at that time was to focus on the opening statement."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010075.jpg
Quote #2
"I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier. I received the"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00010075.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,241 characters)

Casas 202 OF 400033689 AB Nur Donumentt 646-220Filibet|02321412222 R.Rag 401700fdf3080
A-5792
335
C2GFDAU3
Edelstein
1
trial, correct?
2
A.
Yes.
3
Q.
Do you remember who was on those e-mail exchanges that
4
identified Robert Conrad as the father?
5
A.
I believe Theresa Trzaskoma and David Benhamou.
6
Q.
Were you informed of that at the time?
7
A.
No.
8
9
Q. By the way, what was your role, what was your principal
duty in connection with the trial, the defense of David Parse?
10
11
12
13
A. I don't know that I had a principal role. I was involved
in various parts of it. I focused on the opening and the
closing statements, the expert testimony, several of the
witnesses.
14
Q.
Voir dire?
15
A.
No.
16
Q.
Did you assist in voir dire?
17
A.
No.
18
Q.
Not at all?
19
A.
20
21
Well, I participated in a couple of meetings where jurors
were discussed prior to voir dire and then my role really at
that time was to focus on the opening statement.
22
23
24
25
A.
Q. Now, you received the dossier from, well, the link to the
dossier and examined it, are you saying after you received a
copy of the Catherine Conrad letter?
I wouldn't characterize it as a dossier. I received the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010075

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document