This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination related to a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are inconsistencies in the testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting that the allegations involve 'fondling of breasts and buttocks' rather than 'sexual intrusion or penetration.' The Judge clarifies the record regarding paragraph references (33 vs 39) before turning to Ms. Comey (prosecution) for a response.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness/Accuser |
Name appears in header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating she is the subject of the cross-examination discussed.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Arguing inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding dates and specific sexual acts.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the discussion, ruling on objections (sustained on 33), and clarifying testimony records.
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Addressed by the Court at the end of the page, likely invited to respond to the defense's argument.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice, referenced in the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00013219'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the court reporters listed.
|
"I am a lot of things, but I am not a mind reader. I sustained on 33."Source
"the other inconsistency that tracks all of these is there is no allegation of sexual intrusion or penetration."Source
"Every single one of these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks, every single one."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,706 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document