DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg

543 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 543 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the cross-examination related to a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues to the Court that there are inconsistencies in the testimony regarding incidents in July 2002, specifically noting that the allegations involve 'fondling of breasts and buttocks' rather than 'sexual intrusion or penetration.' The Judge clarifies the record regarding paragraph references (33 vs 39) before turning to Ms. Comey (prosecution) for a response.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Carolyn Witness/Accuser
Name appears in header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating she is the subject of the cross-examination discussed.
Mr. Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Arguing inconsistencies in the witness's testimony regarding dates and specific sexual acts.
The Court Judge
Presiding over the discussion, ruling on objections (sustained on 33), and clarifying testimony records.
Ms. Comey Prosecutor
Addressed by the Court at the end of the page, likely invited to respond to the defense's argument.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Listed in the footer.
DOJ
Department of Justice, referenced in the Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR-00013219'.

Timeline (2 events)

August 10, 2022
Filing date of the court document.
Court
July 2002
Alleged incidents discussed in court testimony.
Unspecified in text, but related to the case.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Likely Southern District of New York (SDNY) based on the court reporters listed.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Pagliuca Adversarial/Legal Carolyn
Pagliuca is challenging the consistency of Carolyn's testimony regarding specific dates and acts.

Key Quotes (3)

"I am a lot of things, but I am not a mind reader. I sustained on 33."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg
Quote #1
"the other inconsistency that tracks all of these is there is no allegation of sexual intrusion or penetration."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg
Quote #2
"Every single one of these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks, every single one."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00013219.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,706 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 206 of 264 1647
LC7VMAX7 Carolyn - cross
1 this is inconsistent because we're not -- we're not talking
2 about 2001, we're talking about 2002.
3 THE COURT: Right. But it doesn't specify -- she
4 testified to incidents like these in 2002, and so it's just
5 not -- tell me how it's inconsistent with that testimony.
6 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, you know, for the second time in
7 July of 2002 --
8 THE COURT: No, it doesn't say that.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Paragraph 39 is what I'm looking at.
10 THE COURT: Oh, you told me 33. I am a lot of things,
11 but I am not a mind reader. I sustained on 33.
12 I will go to 39. Go ahead.
13 MR. PAGLIUCA: So for the second time in July of 2002.
14 This is --
15 THE COURT: I mean, that reads like more than one
16 incident in July of 2002.
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: The second, not a third, not a fourth.
18 THE COURT: For the second time. Okay.
19 MR. PAGLIUCA: And when we get through all of this,
20 the other inconsistency that tracks all of these is there is no
21 allegation of sexual intrusion or penetration. Every single
22 one of these allegations is fondling of breasts and buttocks,
23 every single one. And so we have new testimony about the acts
24 that were allegedly performed.
25 THE COURT: All right. Ms. Comey, do you want to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013219

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document