This page appears to be an excerpt from an article or educational text regarding BDSM safety and psychology, produced as part of a House Oversight investigation (likely related to the Epstein case). The text differentiates between consensual BDSM and abuse using criteria such as consent, intent, damage, and secrecy, and references workshops by EduKink and the Community-Academic Consortium for Research on Alternative Sexualities. The author argues that the BDSM community provides a safety network against abuse.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown Author | Author/Speaker |
Narrator of the text, panelist at the 2009 Conference on Alternative Sexualities.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Community-Academic Consortium for Research on Alternative Sexualities |
Organizer of the annual Alternative Sexualities conference.
|
|
| EduKink |
San Francisco-based group that taught the workshop 'The Emotional Aspects of BDSM Play'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of the 2009 Conference on Alternative Sexualities.
|
|
|
Home base of EduKink.
|
"BDSM is consenting; abuse is not."Source
"I believe that the safest place to have a BDSM relationship is within the BDSM community."Source
"A BDSM partner intends to have a mutually enjoyable encounter; an abusive partner does not."Source
"Was consent coerced or seduced from the partner?"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,688 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document