DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg
547 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
547 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on August 10, 2022. It details a discussion between Ms. Sternheim, Mr. Rohrbach, and the Judge regarding the admission of exhibits 823 and 824, followed by a recess due to a juror's train delay. The Judge cites the case 'United States v. Lieberman' in relation to arguments about insurance cards and employer verification of employee information.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Discussing evidence (Exhibits 823 and 824) and legal arguments.
|
| Mr. Rohrbach | Prosecutor (Government) |
Confirming evidence submission and responding to the Judge regarding case law.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the case, managing schedule (juror delay), and citing legal precedent.
|
| Unknown Juror | Juror |
Had a substantial train issue causing a delay in proceedings.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Footer information.
|
|
| 2d Cir. |
Referenced in case citation (Second Circuit).
|
|
| Government |
Referred to by Ms. Sternheim as putting evidence in.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied location of the court (SDNY) based on reporter name.
|
Relationships (1)
Interaction in court transcript regarding evidence.
Key Quotes (4)
"I believe the government is putting those in evidence; is that correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg
Quote #1
"We have one juror who had a substantial train issue and had to back up and revert"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg
Quote #2
"It is United States v. Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980)."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg
Quote #3
"Do you have any reason to think that the witness would testify that the employer does anything to verify the information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018877.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,489 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 755 Filed 08/10/22 Page 15 of 262 1720
LC8Cmax1
LC8Cmax1
1 MS. STERNHEIM: I believe the government is putting
2 those in evidence; is that correct? Are you going to be moving
3 those into evidence?
4 THE COURT: 823 and 824.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, I am.
6 MS. STERNHEIM: You can hold onto them if you would
7 like. I imagine they'll be putting them on the screen.
8 THE COURT: I'll keep them for now then. Thank you.
9 (Recess)
10 THE COURT: We have one juror who had a substantial
11 train issue and had to back up and revert, who called worried
12 that they were late and we said just get here safely. So we're
13 not quite ready with all the jurors yet.
14 Mr. Rohrbach, you know that case, United States v.
15 Lieberman?
16 MR. ROHRBACH: I am not familiar with that case, your
17 Honor.
18 THE COURT: It's pretty much directly on point, I
19 think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of
20 823 and 824. Let me give you the cite. It is United States v.
21 Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980).
22 Do you have any reason to think that the witness would
23 testify that the employer does anything to verify the
24 information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?
25 MR. ROHRBACH: First of all, for 823, your Honor,
2 those in evidence; is that correct? Are you going to be moving
3 those into evidence?
4 THE COURT: 823 and 824.
5 MR. ROHRBACH: Yes, I am.
6 MS. STERNHEIM: You can hold onto them if you would
7 like. I imagine they'll be putting them on the screen.
8 THE COURT: I'll keep them for now then. Thank you.
9 (Recess)
10 THE COURT: We have one juror who had a substantial
11 train issue and had to back up and revert, who called worried
12 that they were late and we said just get here safely. So we're
13 not quite ready with all the jurors yet.
14 Mr. Rohrbach, you know that case, United States v.
15 Lieberman?
16 MR. ROHRBACH: I am not familiar with that case, your
17 Honor.
18 THE COURT: It's pretty much directly on point, I
19 think, for Ms. Sternheim's argument regarding the content of
20 823 and 824. Let me give you the cite. It is United States v.
21 Lieberman, 637 F.2d 95 (2d Cir. 1980).
22 Do you have any reason to think that the witness would
23 testify that the employer does anything to verify the
24 information filled out by the employee on the insurance cards?
25 MR. ROHRBACH: First of all, for 823, your Honor,
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018877
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document